The case involves the levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs ...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act on appellant for smuggling cigarettes upheld. Sufficient opportunity given.

Case Laws Customs

June 6, 2024

The case involves the levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellant for smuggling foreign origin cigarettes. The appellant, a freight forwarder, facilitated the clearance of smuggled goods without proper verification. The penalty of Rs. 5,00,000/- was upheld due to deliberate actions to conceal the smuggling. The appellant was given sufficient opportunity for personal hearing, meeting the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal's decision in a similar case supported the penalty imposition. The penalty on the appellant, a Proprietor in a Freight Forwarding firm, was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involves the levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs ...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act on appellant for smuggling cigarettes upheld. Sufficient opportunity given.

Case Laws Customs

June 6, 2024

You may also like:

Smuggling - Prohibited goods - confiscation of cigarettes containers concealed in HDPE granules - Penalty u/s 112 (a) &(b) and 114AA - The Appellate Tribunal upheld the...

Smuggling of Cigarettes - whether CHA is liable for penalty u/s 112(a) - When there is no evidence to establish that the appellant had prior knowledge of the illegal...

The case involved the absolute confiscation of cigarettes with penalty u/s 105 of Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that while lack of compliance with Cigarettes and...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act 1962 - smuggling of Gold activity - reliability of statements - The appellant cannot come within the ambit of Section...

Levy of penalty - Generalia specialibus non derogant - levy of special penalty over general penalty - the Commissioner perfectly justified in imposing penalty under...

Imposition of penalty - section 112(b) of Customs Act - smuggling - diamonds - The active role of these Appellant, do not justify imposition of heavy penalty under...

Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on an employee of the Customs Broker - classification of imported goods - The commissioner has recorded as finding...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 - Customs House Agent (CHA) - violation of Regulation 13 of CHALR 2004 - It is alleged that the appellant did not...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 (b) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Smuggling - gold biscuits of foreign origin - demand merely on the basis of the statements of the employees of the...

Levy of penalty - allegation for abatement in smuggling of Gold - the activity of facilitating the financing of fund has been turned by the Ld. Commissioner into...

Smuggling of gold - Imposition of penalties u/s 112 - The appellants were intercepted along with their luggage, which was found to contain smuggled gold bars. However,...

Penalty imposed u/s 112a(ii) of Customs Act for smuggling through mis-declaration and undervaluation. Extent of duty evasion uncertain but forensic evidence established...

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

Quick Updates: