Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2024 Year 2024 This

The case involved confiscation of imported goods u/s 111(d) of ...


CESTAT ruled on confiscation of imported goods & penalties u/s 111(d) & 112(a) of CA 1962 when re-exported.

June 8, 2024

Case Laws     Customs     AT

The case involved confiscation of imported goods u/s 111(d) of CA 1962, re-exportation, redemption fine, and penalty u/s 112(a). Goods were imported in contravention of EPR, 1986 making them 'prohibited goods'. Confiscation u/s 111(d) precedes redemption u/s 125. Re-export permission is an administrative process post redemption. No redemption fine on re-exported goods as title vests with govt. Penalty u/s 112(a) is for breach of duty, not cured by re-export. Appellate Tribunal upheld the order, rejecting appellant's claims.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Confiscation of goods and levy of penalty - Import of Pair of Shoes - mis-declaration/suppression in the import documents - Non-compliance of the provisions of the IPR...

  2. Imported material diverted to unit other than permitted unit, resulting in contravention of import-export policy provisions. Goods held liable for confiscation u/s 111...

  3. The case involved the absolute confiscation of cigarettes with penalty u/s 105 of Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that while lack of compliance with Cigarettes and...

  4. Levy of penalty - confiscation of goods - The High court held that the goods imported without a valid Wireless Planning & Coordination (WPC) license, which turned out to...

  5. The case pertains to the alleged misdeclaration of value of zinc ash, a restricted item under the Foreign Trade Policy, requiring an import license. The goods were...

  6. The case involved the scope for retention of penalty u/s 112 of Customs Act, 1962 after liability to confiscation was set aside. Confiscation pertains to goods, while...

  7. Confiscation - import of restricted items - rejection of value - as the importer had tried to import the restricted goods in violation of the provisions of the ITC(HS)...

  8. Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Personal penalty for abetment in evasion of duty of customs - In the context of Section 112(a) of the Customs Act,...

  9. Misdeclaration of imported goods - Bitumen - Country of Origin - Redemption fine - Levy of penalty - The department was well within its right to seize the goods for such...

  10. The case involved verification of Certificate of Origin and non-compliance of FSSAI Regulations u/s 111(m) and 112(a) of the Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that the goods...

  11. Penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation that Chartered Accountant (CA) has abetted the fraud - CA issued the Export Performance Certificate and Solvency...

  12. Imported goods classified under Customs Tariff Item (CTI) 8714 10 90 or 8714 91 00 - General Rules of Interpretation applied for classification - Goods rightly...

  13. Mis-declaration of value, rejection of assessable value of seized goods, and liability for confiscation of goods and imposition of penalty u/s 111(m) of the Customs Act,...

  14. Penalty u/s 112(a) of the CA, 1962 - Mis-declaration of goods - The goods stand absolutely confiscated without giving an option for redemption - The importer seems to...

  15. Seizure of imported goods - Validity of seizure memo - The exercise of seizure is an interim measure pending investigation. What is evident from the affidavit-in-reply...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates