The ITAT held that levying penalty u/s 271D for cash sale ...

Appellate Tribunal ruled against penalty for cash deposits below Rs. 20,000 as unexplained. Sale transactions legit.

June 11, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT held that levying penalty u/s 271D for cash sale transactions is not acceptable. Addition of cash loans below Rs. 20,000 as unexplained deposits u/s 68 was made in the assessment order, but the revenue did not dispute the genuineness of the flat purchase and sale. The assessee entered into an agreement for an under-construction flat, which later went to another party due to financial issues. The ITAT found the AR's submissions realistic, setting aside the CIT(A) order and directing the AO to delete the penalty. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT held that levying penalty u/s 271D for cash sale ...

Appellate Tribunal ruled against penalty for cash deposits below Rs. 20,000 as unexplained. Sale transactions legit.

June 11, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

Court set aside auction sale on equitable grounds as entire amount due was deposited by respondents. Appellant deprived of using Rs.81,20,000 from 21.07.2019 till...

CESTAT upheld reclassification of imported high conductivity copper bus bars from CTI 7407 21 20 to CTI 7407 10 30, resulting in denial of FTA benefits under N/N....

Appellant failed to submit required documents within stipulated time for provisional duty assessment, contravening Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations,...

The assessee's unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were deleted by the CIT(A) after accepting the submissions that the cash receipts from various sources like cash sales,...

Cash credit u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposit during demonetization period - assessee's failure to maintain books of accounts u/s 44AD. Held that where exemption from...

The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed an addition u/s 69A for unexplained cash deposits in the bank account. The assessee failed to explain the sources for cash deposits,...

The appellant could not establish the source for cash deposits during demonetization. The Appellate Tribunal held that sales cannot be rejected solely based on higher...

The assessee, a sole proprietor running a petrol pump allotted by BPCL, deposited unexplained cash in the current bank account. The AO invoked Section 69A and made an...

Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

The ITAT considered the issue of cash deposits and other credits in the assessee's saving bank account. The tribunal noted that the cash deposits were not made in a...

HC addressed valuation dispute regarding exported Printed Circuit Boards where penalty was significantly increased from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in subsequent...

Deposits by the assessee in bank account during demonetization period were not unexplained. Section 69A is inapplicable as there were proper entries for cash sales, cash...

Unexplained cash deposits - Deposits in regular bank account of the assessee, during demonetization period - the assessee was maintaining complete stock tally, the sales...

The case pertains to the imposition of a fine and penalty for the rejection of the declared value and redetermination of the value u/r 12 of the Customs Valuation...

Quick Updates: