Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court considered a Civil Miscellaneous Petition seeking ...


Filing appeal delayed by 891 days - no sufficient cause shown to condone delay. Bona fide motive crucial. Rules of limitation preserve rights.

Case Laws     Central Excise

June 13, 2024

The High Court considered a Civil Miscellaneous Petition seeking condonation of a delay of 891 days in filing an appeal. Emphasizing the legal maxim "interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium," the Court noted that rules of limitation aim to preserve legal remedies within a legislatively fixed period. Lack of bona fide motive, inaction, and negligence are crucial factors in delay condonation. Referring to a Supreme Court case, the Court highlighted that merely establishing sufficient cause does not automatically entitle a party to condone delay. The term "sufficient cause" was interpreted to require absence of negligence or lack of bona fide intent. Ultimately, the Court found no adequate reason to justify the lengthy delay and dismissed the condonation application.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Condonation of delay - inordinate delay of 508 days - “sufficient cause” - In case the delay is not condoned, it would amount to legalise an illegal and unconstitutional...

  2. Condonation of delay - delay of 280 days - sufficient cause - The Tribunal noted that the delay was due to the callous and lackadaisical approach of the appellant in not...

  3. Condonation of delay of 1433 days in filing appeal before the tribunal - Tribunal condoned the delay in revenue appeal - error of law or not - In view of the facts and...

  4. The case pertains to a delay of two days in filing the Return of Income and Form 10-IC due to technical difficulties on the Income Tax Portal. The Chartered Accountant...

  5. Condonation of delay in filing an application for special leave to appeal before the High Court. The applicant, an Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, sought...

  6. Condonation of delay - delay of almost 318 days - There is no culpable negligence or mala fide on the part of the assessee in delayed filing of the present appeal and he...

  7. Delay of 1154 days in filing appeal before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was not condoned as reasons given, such as leaving income tax matters in hands of...

  8. Condonation of delay of 5318 days in filing the appeal - The reasons set out in the affidavit filed in support of the petition to condone the delay of 5318 days i.e.,...

  9. Condonation of delay of 1434 days - Section 35B(3) of CEA - delay due to illness of concern persons and misplacement of paper due to loss of memory - sub-section (5)...

  10. Seeking to Condone Delay of 14 days in filing the Appeal - Sufficient cause for delay or not - Even if the Appellant's argument regarding the delay in accessing the...

  11. Condonation of delay in filing appeal - “sufficient cause or reason” of delay - If the negligence or omission is a by-product of a deliberate attempt with mala fide...

  12. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) - delay of 636 days - The conduct of the assessee is such that there was clear negligence on its part and...

  13. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal - delay of 326 days - sufficient cause - After considering the arguments and perusing the materials, the Tribunal found that...

  14. Condonation of delay in filling appeal before ITAT - delay of 384 days - The assessee's delay in filing appeals, ranging from 383 to 384 days, was not condoned due to...

  15. Condonation of delay - 353 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal - The sufficient cause within the contemplation of the limitation provision must be a cause...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates