The ITAT upheld the Revision u/s 263 by PCIT, finding the AO's ...

PCIT found AO's assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153C erroneous. PCIT directipn for fresh assessment sustained.

June 15, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT upheld the Revision u/s 263 by PCIT, finding the AO's assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue. The unsigned assessment order in ITBA portal was deemed immaterial for invoking u/s 263. PCIT's direction for fresh assessment was justified as AO omitted to consider share profits. Proposed addition under u/s 69A was exempted u/s 10(2A) as firm was separately assessed. PCIT's direction on share of profit verification was upheld as no evidence showed it related to earlier years. PCIT's order was not cryptic and PCIT rightly found AO's assessment prejudicial to Revenue. The grounds challenging PCIT's decision were dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT upheld the Revision u/s 263 by PCIT, finding the AO's ...

PCIT found AO's assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153C erroneous. PCIT directipn for fresh assessment sustained.

June 15, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT quashed assessment order made under section 143(3) for AY 2021-22, declaring it void ab initio. The assessment, based on materials from search operations conducted...

Assessment u/s 153C - AR submitted that the impugned assessment order framed under S. 143(3) - the search took place - assessment ought to have been framed u/s 153C...

Validity of assessment made under Section 143(1) instead of section 153C - In the facts of the present appeal, undisputedly, the books of account/documents/assets found...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Earlier, ITAT remanded the matter back requesting the AO to provide reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. - AO must have...

Assessment u/s 153A - scope of assessments u/s 153C/ 153A - the additions made in the order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153C, for the captioned assessment years which are...

The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS. The PCIT observed that the assessee, along with two co-owners, had purchased an immovable property...

The assessment year in question falls beyond the stipulated six assessment years and four relevant assessment years, rendering the notice issued by the Assessing Officer...

Assessment u/s 153C versus 143 - Additions u/s 45 - Underreporting of sale consideration for immovable property while framing the Assessment Order u/s 143(3) - Whether...

Cancellation of registration u/s 12AB(4) - violation of provisions of Sections 11(1)(a), 11(1)(d), and 13(1)(c). The reference made under the second proviso of Section...

ITAT ruled against Principal CIT's revision under Section 263, finding the order procedurally flawed. The tribunal held that PCIT cannot delegate verification...

Validity of assessment order - Assessing Officer himself has not considered the assessment year 2008-09 as covered u/s 153C of the Act. The assessing Officer has issued...

ITAT determined that for proceedings under section 153C, the relevant assessment years should be AY 2017-18 to 2022-23, based on the satisfaction note recorded by AO on...

Validity of Assessment u/s 153C - whether AO of the searched person has not recorded satisfaction note that the books of accounts/material belongs to the assessee ? - In...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153C/143(3) against Settlement Commission order - The Tribunal found the reassessment to infringe upon the principles laid out by...

Validity of reopening of assessment - assessment proceeding u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153C of the Act was completed - When assessment is completed u/s 143(3) or u/s 144 of the...

Quick Updates: