The High Court considered the liability of the petitioner u/s 73 ...

Principles of natural justice: Court says assessee deserve a fair hearing. Order set aside for fresh consideration.

Case Laws GST

June 17, 2024

The High Court considered the liability of the petitioner u/s 73 (9) of the Central Goods and Services Tax / Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It was found that the petitioner was not provided with an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The court held that the order for the financial years 2017-18 and 2018-19 should be set aside, and the petitioner must be given a hearing as per Section 75 (4) of the KGST Act. The matter is remitted to respondent No. 1 for fresh consideration in accordance with the law. The petition was allowed by way of remand.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court considered the liability of the petitioner u/s 73 ...

Principles of natural justice: Court says assessee deserve a fair hearing. Order set aside for fresh consideration.

Case Laws GST

June 17, 2024

You may also like:

The final decision in this case by the Odisha Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) was set aside due to procedural irregularities and violation of principles of...

Blocking of a supplier's credit ledger by mentioning 'Registration of supplier has been cancelled' without issuing a show cause notice violates principles of natural...

Customs duty concession case remanded due to violation of principles of natural justice by not providing relied upon documents. Department denied copies of investigation...

Freezing of Assets and ‘Bank Accounts’ of the Appellant - Opportunity of Hearing provided or not - principles of natural justice - NCLT is directed to pass necessary...

Assessment order quashed due to breach of principles of natural justice. Standard Operating Procedure mandates seven days' response time to show cause notice, but...

Violation of principles of natural justice - technical glitch - Despite the Department's submission that the petitioner had been informed in advance about the correct...

The case concerns the reopening of assessment u/s 147 based on information from the Non-filers Monitoring System (NMS) about cash deposits in the assessee's bank account....

Determination of tax u/s 73(9) of the CGST/SGST Act - petitioner submits that the order is passed merely on the representation of the petitioner without giving any...

Denial of registration u/s. 12AB(1)(ac)(vi) and approval u/s.80G(5)(iv) - The tribunal has noted a recent judgement of High Court wherein taking note of this SOP held...

Validity of summary order passed u/s 140 and 43(9) - Matching of credit - Violation of principles of natural justice - order passed ex-parte in nature - Violation of...

Validity of orders that were ex parte in nature - The order are ex facie, bad in law, because (a) violation of principles of natural justice, i.e. Fair opportunity of...

Notices issued to a deceased person and subsequent assessment orders passed based on such notices are void ab initio, violating principles of natural justice. The High...

The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

Disciplinary enquiry by ICAI - statutory auditors of Satyam Computers Services Limited - Principles of natural justice - HC

Appellate authority erred in dismissing appeal solely on ground of lack of authorisation of signatory, without affording opportunity to establish authorisation or...

Quick Updates: