In a case before the High Court, the issue was the correctness ...

High Court: Impugned order wrongly issued in wrong name but correct GSTIN. Petitioner can appeal within 30 days, deposit 10% disputed tax. Appeal to be heard within 3 months.

Case Laws GST

June 18, 2024

In a case before the High Court, the issue was the correctness of an order that was issued in the wrong name but with the correct GSTIN of the petitioner, Srinivasan Charitable and Educational Trust. The Court held that the petitioner can file a statutory appeal u/s 107 of the GST Act within 30 days, upon depositing 10% of the disputed tax. The Appellate Commissioner must then hear and decide the appeal within three months. The petitioner must also be given an opportunity to be heard. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

View Source

← Previous Next →

In a case before the High Court, the issue was the correctness ...

High Court: Impugned order wrongly issued in wrong name but correct GSTIN. Petitioner can appeal within 30 days, deposit 10% disputed tax. Appeal to be heard within 3 months.

Case Laws GST

June 18, 2024

You may also like:

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Issuing of notice u/s 148 in the wrong name - it was only a typographical error in first name of the assessee though other...

Cancellation of the IEC - EPCG Scheme - levy of penalty - the learned Judge while disposing the writ petition filed by the appellant, challenging the order of...

Ex-parte assessment order - service of notice - it is alleged that the orders have been issued in complete violation to section 73 (8) of the GST Act which prescribes...

Rejection of request for provisional release of the seized goods - high end wrist watches - prohibited goods or not - In the present case, the appellant had not only...

Seeking Condonation of Delay of 14 days in filing of the Appeal - It is really strange that the agency of the Government failed to seek the required information within...

Dishonour of cheque case instituted within 30 days from legal notice date satisfies condition precedent for cognizance u/s 138 and 142(b) of NI Act. Complaint within...

Maintainability of appeal u/s 107 against cancellation of GST registration due to non-filing of returns discussed. Delay in filing appeal could have been condoned under...

Reducing the time provided for furnishing TP report - Now any information, documents required by AO for international transaction U/s 92D has to be furnished within 10...

Revocation of CBL License - 90 days from the date of issuance of SCN is when the noticee submits reply within 30 days and in a case like this, when the noticee has not...

The High Court, considering the precedent set in the case of Rehoboth Fish Meal and Oil Plant, held that the petitioner should be granted a stay on recovery proceedings...

Challenging the validity of show cause notice (SCN) - Recovery of Swachh Bharat Cess - service provided by the petitioner by putting in rail linings - The High Court...

Dishonor of Cheque - service of demand notice - Period of limitation - the petitioner relies on the dates of return memos, i.e., dates of return of cheques in question,...

Refund claim - effect of name change - defective return u/s 139(9) or not - in whose name the refund should be issued? - PAN database correction would certainly indicate...

Legal notice for dishonor of cheque due to insufficient funds was sent on 19.12.2018. Presuming service within 30 days, it should be deemed served by 17.1.2019. However,...

The High Court interpreted Section 140(5) of the CGST Act regarding transition of credit. The petitioner sought extension under the proviso to Section 140(5) but was...

Quick Updates: