Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2024 Year 2024 This

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the validity of ...


The appellate tribunal upheld the validity of assessment reopening u/s 147, adding income u/s 68. Assessee failed to prove legitimacy of transactions. Tribunal denied interference.

Case Laws     Income Tax

June 19, 2024

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the validity of reopening assessment u/s 147 and addition u/s 68. The AO had sufficient material to believe the assessee introduced unaccounted income as bogus share capital, leading to income escapement. The notice u/s 147 was upheld as valid. The assessee failed to prove creditworthiness of share applicant or transaction genuineness. AO's addition u/s 68 was deemed justified, concluding the assessee channeled its own funds through investor companies. The assessee engaged in dubious activities, introducing unaccounted money through questionable transactions. The CIT(A)'s order was upheld, ruling against the assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Addition u/s 68 - The function of the assessing authority at this stage is to administer the statute and what is required...

  2. The case involves the validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 based on reasons to believe, where the head of income was changed from business to income from...

  3. Validity of reopening the assessment u/s 147 - Additions u/s 68 and u/s 69A - Cash deposits in assessee’s bank account - The ITAT observed that, the AO was satisfied...

  4. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reason to believe - there was tangible material before the AO to reopen the concluded assessment as the assessee is claiming huge...

  5. The case pertains to the validity of reopening of assessment by the Assessing Officer (AO) and the characterization of short-term capital gains (STCG) from the sale of...

  6. Reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 - failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) - reopening of assessment is not valid as the Income Tax Department has power to conduct the...

  7. Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reason to believe - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the reassessment proceedings were initiated solely based on the...

  8. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment solely based on the information from a survey conducted by the Sales Tax Department, without independently examining...

  9. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 due to the assessee providing bogus accommodation loss entries. The AO had reasons to believe in the...

  10. The case pertains to the reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 of the Income Tax Act due to undisclosed cash deposits in the assessee's bank accounts. The key points are:...

  11. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - addition u/s 68 - The law regarding reopening of assessment is well-settled. The reliance placed upon the findings of the earlier...

  12. Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reason to believe - Addition u/s 69C on account of the capital introduced by the partner and unsecured loans - The Tribunal...

  13. The crux of the matter revolves around the reopening of assessment u/s 147 of the Act and the addition made u/s 68 treating the share application received as a...

  14. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as there was no failure by the assessee to disclose material facts. The assessment was reopened solely based on information...

  15. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Disallowance u/s 14A - If at all he has considered, he has not even passed the assessment order by ignoring the provisions of law, i.e....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates