The case involved a dispute over unjust enrichment where the ...

Appellant not asked to prove customers received goods. Revenue didn't check if goods were cleared. Refund claim approved, Revenue appeal dismissed.

Case Laws Central Excise

June 24, 2024

The case involved a dispute over unjust enrichment where the appellant was required to prove that customers received machines/equipment as invoiced. The Revenue failed to investigate with customers or transporters. Goods seized by Revenue were linked to the invoices. The appellant did not confirm clearance of goods. The Commissioner(Appeals) approved a refund, finding the appellant paid duty twice. The order was upheld, dismissing Revenue's appeal. The issue of unjust enrichment was referred for further verification.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involved a dispute over unjust enrichment where the ...

Appellant not asked to prove customers received goods. Revenue didn't check if goods were cleared. Refund claim approved, Revenue appeal dismissed.

Case Laws Central Excise

June 24, 2024

You may also like:

Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

Confiscation of goods imported - misuse of its IEC - The assessee has not proved beyond reasonable doubt that the goods in question imported under the air way...

Valuation of goods - method of valuation - sale of goods from depot / customer care center - It is found that the form in which the goods have been sold at depot are in...

Extended period of limitation - Demand of differential duty alongwith ineterst and penalty - The Assessing Officer would have checked and asked for the RSP of the motor...

Evasion of service tax - allegation that Appellant have collected the service tax from the customers but not paid it to Department - In the present matter revenue in...

Clandestine removal - Goods cleared without issuing invoices and CE duty was leviable on those goods - admission by the party itself - admissible evidences or not - In...

Levy of Special Excise duty - Air Conditioners and parts - case of the department is that the goods which have been cleared by the appellant are having essential...

CENVAT Credit - inputs - Copper Ingots/imported Ingots/Bars - alleged fictitious purchases - there is no evidence of flow back of funds to the appellant - the revenue...

Valuation of imported goods - On the one hand OIO says there are no imports of identical or similar goods, and the other hand re-determines the values of some goods on...

Valuation of imported goods - the onus of proving charge of undervaluation lies on the Revenue which needs to be proved by way of producing necessary evidence - the...

HC rejected challenge to adjudication order denying ITC. Appellant, purchaser, argued valid tax invoice and taxes paid; if supplier's registration cancelled, ITC denial...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - export goods or not - goods were cleared by the appellant, not for physical exports, but were cleared by them to their sister concern, who is...

Appellant, a proprietary firm, was levied penalty for involvement in illegality by not receiving goods and receiving invoices only with intention to avail CENVAT credit...

Declared service or not - amount of compensation received by the appellant on the act of tolerance by receiving the claim for poor quality of the goods - The said act is...

CENVAT Credit - duty paying documents - Allegation of non-receipt of goods - The benefit of doubt goes in favour of the appellants that they have received the goods...

Quick Updates: