The High Court interpreted Section 140(5) of the CGST Act ...

Court ruling: Late filing not reason enough to deny transition of credit extension u/s 140(5) of CGST Act.

Case Laws GST

June 26, 2024

The High Court interpreted Section 140(5) of the CGST Act regarding transition of credit. The petitioner sought extension under the proviso to Section 140(5) but was rejected for not filing within the time limit. The section allows credit for duties/taxes on inputs received post the appointed day if recorded within 30 days, extendable by Commissioner for another 30 days on showing sufficient cause. The court held that the rejection based on late filing was incorrect as the provision allows for an extension. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court interpreted Section 140(5) of the CGST Act ...

Court ruling: Late filing not reason enough to deny transition of credit extension u/s 140(5) of CGST Act.

Case Laws GST

June 26, 2024

You may also like:

The summary focuses on the refund claim rejection based on the ground that the amount paid under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) is not admissible u/r 9(1)(bb) of CENVAT...

Refund of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess (SHE Cess) under the transitional provisions of the CGST Act, 2017. The key points are: Cess is a tax...

Correctness of erasure of credit already availed by prospective invalidation of eligibility for retention of credit that would subject those services already procured...

Refund of CENVAT Credit under rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - Notification

Validity of provisional attachment order - benefit of Input Tax Credit availed from invoices issued from non-existing firms - It observes that the impugned order lacks...

Levy of interest and penalty - transition of amount wrongly claimed as input tax credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - The court confirmed that the petitioner was...

The High Court ruled that the petitioner's entitlement to avail Input Tax Credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 cannot be denied, as long as the credit was validly...

Directions u/s 168 of the CGST Act regarding non-transition of CENVAT credit u/s 140 of CGST Act or non-utilization thereof in certain cases.

The High Court addressed the transition of unutilized input tax credit from VAT returns u/s 140 of GST enactments. It held that credits availed under TNVAT Act are...

Rule 117(4)(b)(iii) of the CGST Rules was challenged as ultra vires Section 140(3) of the CGST Act and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. The court held that...

Demand of late fee u/s 47(1) of the CGST / SGST Act - delay in filing of returns - Amnesty Scheme - GST portal does not support payment of late fee for late filing...

Transitional credit - Unutilized amount of Advanced VAT paid - The court found that if the amount of advance tax paid under the VAT regime remained unutilized, it should...

Transitional credit - TDS was transitioned under Section 140 of the TNGST Act, 2017, along with the “purchase tax” - The High court held that there is no scope for...

Extension of time for filing refund claim under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - question needs to be factually addressed only by the adjudicating authority - AT

Refund of accumulated Cenvat credit - Applicability of Rule 5 of CCR - Even if the contention of the revenue was to be accepted then also the credit should have been...

Quick Updates: