The High Court held that prosecution u/ss 276C, 277, 278B, and ...

Prosecution for tax evasion invalid without confirmed penalty exceeding Rs. 50,000. Penalty deleted by ITAT, so prosecution unwarranted. Mens rea essential for prosecution.

Case Laws Income Tax

July 2, 2024

The High Court held that prosecution u/ss 276C, 277, 278B, and 278E for tax evasion was invalid as it violated CBDT guidelines. Prosecution was premature without the penalty confirmed by ITAT, against the instructions. The CBDT policy requires processing for prosecution only after a penalty exceeding Rs. 50,000 is confirmed. As the ITAT set aside the penalty, prosecution was deemed unwarranted. Mens rea is essential for prosecution, and since ITAT deleted the penalty, continuing prosecution was unjust. The Supreme Court precedent establishes that penalty and prosecution go together; when penalty is deleted, prosecution cannot proceed. With no appeal filed against the ITAT order, prosecution was barred by finality. Following a SC ruling, exoneration in departmental proceedings leads to the failure of criminal prosecution. Petitions were allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court held that prosecution u/ss 276C, 277, 278B, and ...

Prosecution for tax evasion invalid without confirmed penalty exceeding Rs. 50,000. Penalty deleted by ITAT, so prosecution unwarranted. Mens rea essential for prosecution.

Case Laws Income Tax

July 2, 2024

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment beyond three years requires sanction from Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, whereas the assessee obtained sanction from Principal...

The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal...

Jurisdiction of Superintendent to pass the order - Monetary limit - The High Court noted that, the circular dated 9.2.2018 limited the power of the Superintendent,...

Income Tax: To facilitate ease of doing business and reduce compliance burden, it is proposed to amend section 197 to bring section 194Q (tax deduction on purchase of...

The petitioner sought release of an export subsidy of Rs. 8,08,50,000/-. The respondent confirmed that the milk powder exported by the petitioner, amounting to 1617...

In accordance with CBDT Instruction No. 3 of 2017, the AO exceeded jurisdiction by conducting inquiry into cash deposits up to Rs. 2.5 lakhs by an individual without...

Demand Interest u/s 201(1A) - Non deduction TDS u/s 194IA - As per the sale deed the details of the sellers / transferors of the said property and in fact the sellers...

The case pertains to the imposition of a fine and penalty for the rejection of the declared value and redetermination of the value u/r 12 of the Customs Valuation...

The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

The High Court quashed the impugned show cause notice for service tax demand exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/- due to the department's failure to conduct mandatory pre-notice...

Imported goods classification disputed - whether silver jewellery freely importable or restricted category under ITC (HS) Code 71069210. Court found respondent's...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) and u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abetment in undervaluation - evasion of Customs Duty by several syndicates of crane...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that surcharge is not leviable when the total income is less than Rs. 50 lacs. The Assessing Officer had contended that...

Amendment to rules governing salary, allowances and service conditions of Chairperson and members of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India. Key changes: Chairperson's...

Quick Updates: