The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of addition u/s 68 ...

Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of assessee on alleged bogus capital gains! No direct link to wrongdoing found.

Case Laws Income Tax

July 3, 2024

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of addition u/s 68 for alleged bogus long-term capital gain. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer's reliance on a general investigation report and statements did not directly implicate the assessee or her broker in any wrongdoing. The Tribunal noted that the department did not link the assessee or her broker to entities identified by SEBI for price manipulation. The AO's reliance on the SEBI order and the suspension of trading in the scrip of M/s. Sunrise was deemed irrelevant. Citing a precedent, the Tribunal held that the transactions were genuine, and the assessee's claim for exemption u/s 10(38) was allowed. The decision favored the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of addition u/s 68 ...

Appellate Tribunal rules in favor of assessee on alleged bogus capital gains! No direct link to wrongdoing found.

Case Laws Income Tax

July 3, 2024

You may also like:

The ITAT Mumbai addressed errors in capital gain computation. The Assessee's claim of ₹ 859,680 was accepted over the AO's ₹ 791,221. An application u/s 154...

The assessee, an NRI and resident of USA, transferred a capital asset and derived capital gain. The asset comprised rights and interests acquired through an assignment...

The Appellate Tribunal considered whether the sale proceeds of residential units should be treated as capital gains or business receipts. It was found that the...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of Long Term Capital Gains arising from a joint development agreement. The question was whether the capital gain tax should be...

The assessee claimed that no capital gain was chargeable on receipt from transfer of trademark as there was no cost of acquisition. However, the tribunal held that the...

Estimation of income - bogus purchases - The Tribunal considered the facts surrounding the alleged bogus purchases. Despite the inability of the assessee to establish...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

The ITAT Hyderabad held that the capital asset, as defined in section 2(14) of the Act, must be held by the assessee and not connected with their business or profession....

Capital gain from sale of commercial property - intra-head adjustment of loss - Benefit of carry forward of long term capital loss on the sale of shares for the current...

Capital Gain - Receipt of consolidated amount - where a gain from one of capital assets was a short-term capital gain while from other it was a long term capital gain,...

Long-term capital gain - cost of acquisition - capital gain worked out by the DVO - They have calculated the long-term capital gain simply by taking into consideration...

The assessee sold agricultural land during the year which the Assessing Officer (AO) treated as a capital asset, leading to levy of long-term capital gains tax. The...

Correct head of income - interest on FD and gain of sale of mutual funds invested out of unutilized borrowed fund - interest/gains earned by the assessee company during...

The ITAT Hyderabad addressed the issue of determining the correct head of income for gains on the sale of property, whether it should be classified as business income or...

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - Bogus capital introduced by the partners of the assessee-firm - as per CIT(A) Agriculture income shown by the partners was highly...

Quick Updates: