The court found the petition maintainable despite the time ...

Tax notice missed online, court allows fresh hearing on depositing 10% tax. Order quashed, case remanded for new decision.

Case Laws GST

July 4, 2024

The court found the petition maintainable despite the time limitation, as the petitioner failed to notice the show cause notice (SCN) posted on the GST common portal. Partial relief was granted by quashing the impugned order and remitting the case back to the respondent for fresh orders, subject to the petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax from its Electronic Cash Register. The quashed order shall be treated as an addendum to the preceding show cause notice.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The court found the petition maintainable despite the time ...

Tax notice missed online, court allows fresh hearing on depositing 10% tax. Order quashed, case remanded for new decision.

Case Laws GST

July 4, 2024

You may also like:

Petitioner challenged adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 regarding discrepancies in returns, short payment of tax, and excess availment of Input Tax...

The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the...

Violation of principles of natural justice - petitioner was unaware of the impugned order due to notices being hosted on GST Common Portal, resulting in unawareness for...

Validity of assessment order and bank attachment notice - no personal hearing provided - The High court notes that the petitioner was not heard before the order issuance...

Waiver of pre-deposit - 7.5% was deposited before filing an appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) - Now whether appellant is required to deposit entire 10% amount in...

Impugned order quashed, case remitted to pass fresh orders subject to petitioner depositing disputed tax amount. Impugned order treated as addendum to preceding show...

The High Court considered a challenge to an order u/s WBGST Act due to a 32-day delay in filing an appeal and non-deposit of pre-deposit. The petitioner provided...

The HC quashed the impugned order for violating principles of natural justice, as the petitioner's explanation during personal hearing was not discussed. It remanded the...

Determination of quantum of pre-deposit for filing of appeal - deposit of 10% of the disputed tax amount - The legislative intent as construed from Section 107(6)(b) of...

The High Court found a violation of the principles of natural justice due to the Assessing Authority's denial of an oral hearing opportunity. The court held that even if...

Customs broker's license suspension case involving violations of Regulations 10(d) and 10(e) of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. Gross mis-declaration...

Customs broker's license revoked, entire security deposit forfeited, penalty levied for contravening Regulations 10(a), 10(b), 10(d), 10(e), 10(f), 10(k) & 10(n) of...

Pre-deposit before filing af appeal - It is contended that, the entire tax liability has been deducted from the cash ledger, thereby the requirement of 10% of...

Non-issuance of ASMT-10 notice vitiated scrutiny conclusions but not adjudication as petitioner was provided opportunity to show cause - Tax proposal confirmed due to...

The Allahabad High Court addressed the denial of a personal hearing in a tax assessment case, emphasizing the mandatory nature of such hearings u/s 75(4) of the U.P. GST...

Quick Updates: