Refund claim denied u/s 239(2)(c) as assessee filed return after ...

Refund claim allowed u/s 240 for Rs. 27,04,767/- despite late filing, overriding AO & CIT(A) orders.

Case Laws Income Tax

July 8, 2024

Refund claim denied u/s 239(2)(c) as assessee filed return after one year from last date of relevant assessment year. Assessee contended case covered u/s 240 as refund consequent to appellate order. Held, Section 239 applies to refund by self-assessment, Section 240 covers refund pursuant to appellate order. ACIT passed order u/ss 251/154/147/143(3) determining refund. Assessee's case covered u/s 240, not Section 239. Orders of AO and CIT(A) set aside, assessee entitled to refund of Rs. 27,04,767/-. Appeal allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim denied u/s 239(2)(c) as assessee filed return after ...

Refund claim allowed u/s 240 for Rs. 27,04,767/- despite late filing, overriding AO & CIT(A) orders.

Case Laws Income Tax

July 8, 2024

You may also like:

Yearly Claim of refund of unutilized cenvat credit - Notification number 27/2012 contemplates for filing of refund claims of unutilised Cenvat credit quarterly, but it...

Refund claim - The decision of ITC Limited is not applicable to the present facts and circumstances of the case as at the time of filing of Bills of Entry, the appellant...

Refund claim of late fee mistakenly paid - late fee waived off by public notice no.21/2020 - It is found that the Revenue is taking a contradictory stand in as much as...

Refund of unutilized cenvat credit - validity of SCN - As per the Notification No.27/2012, there is no requirement to debit in the service return, the only requirement...

Refund claim - Bar of limitation - Respondent filed refund claim consequential to the dropping of demand under adjudication order dated 27/11/2009 within 3 months -...

The period of limitation of one year does not apply when the amount claimed as refund has been paid under protest. Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962, only recognizes...

The case involved a dispute over the refund of a cash security deposit u/s 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal held that the rejection of the refund on...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Relevant date for filing of Refund - It is settled that even if the refund claim is filed well within the time and the same is returned for want of clarification or...

The case involved a claim for refund of interest u/s 72 of Finance Act, 2010 to benefit from a retrospective amendment to Rule 6 of CCR, 2002/2004. The Tribunal held...

Refund of excise duty paid erroneously - When the appellant realized that he has paid excess duty thereafter he filed the refund application under Section 11B of the...

Refund claim - Export of goods - refund claims have to be filed shipping bill-wise or not - a conjoint reading of the Notification and the Form A-1 appended to the...

4% SAD refund claim – CBEC allows filing of refund claim at each Customs stations where imports are made instead of single application per Commissionerate.

Refund of Additional Duty of Customs paid - to allow the limitation period to start from the date of payment of duty as prescribed under the amended notification, would...

Quick Updates: