Penalty u/s 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 was levied against ...

Penalty on CHAs for not verifying exporters' KYC set aside; due diligence breach attracts CBLR provisions, not Sec 117 penalty.

Case Laws Customs

July 17, 2024

Penalty u/s 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 was levied against appellants, Customs House Agents (CHAs), for not exercising due diligence. The allegation was that appellants facilitated fraudulent export and availed undue drawback by not verifying exporters' antecedents. However, it was held that the act of not being diligent in verifying exporters' antecedents attracts provisions of CBLR, 2018, not penalty u/s 117. The Tribunal had previously ruled that penalty for not verifying exporter's KYC cannot be sustained. Consequently, the penalty imposed on appellants u/s 117 was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 was levied against ...

Penalty on CHAs for not verifying exporters' KYC set aside; due diligence breach attracts CBLR provisions, not Sec 117 penalty.

Case Laws Customs

July 17, 2024

You may also like:

Revocation of CHA License - appellant failed to verify the address at which the two clients operated and that requirement of ‘know your customer (KYC)’ was entirely...

Revocation of customs broker Licence - the customs broker should have exercised a due diligence in verifying KYC norms and the identity of the exporter and their persons...

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

Levy of penalty on CHA - duty drawback making fraudulent export of readymade garments - The allegations that the appellant did not verify the KYC documents of Exporter...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Second Amendment Rules, 2018 - Client Due Diligence - filing of the electronic copy of the client's KYC records...

Revocation of customs broker license and levy of penalty found unjustified. Alleged violations of Regulations 10(a), 10(b), 10(d) & 10(n) of CBLR, 2018 regarding...

Revocation of customs broker license invalid due to contradictory findings - forefeiture of security deposit and penalty levy set aside - no evidence of subletting...

The appellants, who were neither exporters nor Customs House Agents (CHAs), were wrongly penalized u/ss 114 and 114AA for overvaluation of goods for claiming excess duty...

Revocation of Customs Broker License - Overvaluation and misdeclaration with intent to claim drawback under section 75 of Customs Act, 1962 - The tribunal acknowledged...

CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled on the revocation of a Customs Broker License and forfeiture of security deposit. The case involved risky exporters engaged in frauds, with...

Central Government amends Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005 regarding client due diligence. Reporting entities must obtain KYC...

The appeal challenges the revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed for alleged violations of Regulations 10(d) and 10(n)...

Penalty on Customs Broker under Regulation 18 of CBLR, 2018 - violation of regulation 10(o) and Regulation 10(b) - Despite allegations of the exporter attempting...

The case before CESTAT New Delhi involved fraudulent registration and utilization of duty-free scrips, leading to penalties. The appellant failed to comply with...

Quick Updates: