Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents ...

Tribunal: Order based on binding precedent can't be recalled/reviewed due to later contrary higher court judgment. Final order can't be reopened u/s 254(2).

Case Laws Income Tax

July 17, 2024

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order attains finality between parties, it cannot be reopened or reviewed u/s 254(2) due to a later overruling judgment. The power u/s 254(2) is akin to Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC and cannot be exercised beyond the scope of review under that provision. Consequently, the department's application seeking recall of the Tribunal's order based on a subsequent Supreme Court judgment was dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents ...

Tribunal: Order based on binding precedent can't be recalled/reviewed due to later contrary higher court judgment. Final order can't be reopened u/s 254(2).

Case Laws Income Tax

July 17, 2024

You may also like:

The case involves a review petition filed in the Madhya Pradesh High Court seeking to recall an order that dismissed an appeal due to the absence of substantial...

Power of Tribunal to review the judgment versus Power to re-call - Larger Bench (5 Members) decision - The judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court clearly lays down that...

The decisions of the Hon’ble non-jurisdictional High Court have no relevance in the present context. It is also elementary in law that the mere pendency of the appeal,...

The case before the Allahabad High Court involved the jurisdiction of the Collector (Stamp) to recall or review an order under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act,...

Power of tribunal to review application - It is the well laid down proposition of law that ‘in the absence of any power of ‘Review’ or ‘Recall’ vested with the...

Review petition - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Tribunal sustaining the levy without providing an opportunity of hearing - Review applicant had paid entire tax amount...

ITAT dismissed assessee's appeal citing low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No.3/2018, giving Revenue liberty to recall dismissal if covered by exceptions. Assessee...

Dishonour of cheque - no order for conversion into summons triable matter - application of Section 145(2) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - violation of natural...

Request for recalling an order wherein the appeal was dismissed on the ground of delay in filing an appeal - assessee cannot expect the Tribunal to become a party to its...

Rejection of declaration for Tax Relief under the provisions of Sabka Vikas [Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - mistake apparent on record or sufficient reasons...

Review petition - error on record - power to correct - earlier judgment suffers from error apparent on the face of record and is liable to be recalled/reviewed. The...

Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

Powers of the review under Section 25 of MVAT Act, 2002 cannot be exercised unilaterally. That before exercising such powers, service of valid notice is condition...

Binding nature of the Circular which is contrary to the statutory provisions of the Act - the circular has a binding force upon the revenue and they cannot contend to...

Quick Updates: