Excess duty paid due to issuance of credit notes to dealers and ...

Excess duty refund denied due to unjust enrichment. Appellants failed to prove non-passing of excess duty to customers.

Case Laws Central Excise

July 22, 2024

Excess duty paid due to issuance of credit notes to dealers and stockists after clearance of goods was rejected on grounds of incidence being passed on and lack of evidence that it was not passed on to ultimate customers. Principles of unjust enrichment u/s 11B read with Section 12B of Central Excise Act were examined. Appellants failed to establish non-passing of excess duty to customers. Merely selling on MRP basis did not absolve them. Supreme Court's Addison and Co. Ltd. judgment applied, entitling refund on merits but not on unjust enrichment grounds. Section 12B's applicability was upheld based on CEGAT and Supreme Court judgments like Grasim Industries, Sangam Processors. Appellants hit by Section 12B for failure to prove non-passing of excess duty. Refund eligible on merits but cannot be disbursed; to be dealt with u/s 12D. Commissioner's non-entitlement on merits unsustainable, but order sustainable on unjust enrichment applicability.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Excess duty paid due to issuance of credit notes to dealers and ...

Excess duty refund denied due to unjust enrichment. Appellants failed to prove non-passing of excess duty to customers.

Case Laws Central Excise

July 22, 2024

You may also like:

Refund claim of excess duty denied due to unjust enrichment - goods sold based on LME price index. Revenue contended appellant booked excess duty as revenue expenditure...

Refund claim of excess duty paid - unjust enrichment - after issuance of corrigendum the excess duty, paid lacks the colour of duty and is merely a deposit - the excess...

Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

Refund of SAD - denial of refund on the ground that the test of unjust enrichment not passed on - non-collection of excess duty paid by the appellant - The certificate...

Refund - unjust enrichment - excess payment of duty due to valuation dispute - in terms of legally enforceable Agreement of the appellant with HLL, the loan amount, was...

Refund of Excess Customs Duty paid - principles of unjust enrichment - Following proceedings before the Settlement Commission, it was determined that the appellant had...

CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund of wrongly paid Central Excise Duty on Retail Sale Price (Maximum Retail Price-MRP) - unjust enrichment - The authorities concluded that the appellant had passed...

The appellant sought refund of countervailing duty (CVD) paid while importing goods declared as 'Natural gum in raw form' through Bills of Entry filed during 2011-2014....

The appellant agreed that duty paid by mistake to the government was passed on to the principal contractor under protest. Their argument was that the principal...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

The case involved a refund claim for duty paid under protest, rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment. The appellant paid duty under protest and filed a refund claim...

Refund claim alongwith interest - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - As from the facts itself, it is clear that the appellants were not required to pay any...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - excess duty paid under the provision of Chewing Tobacco & Unmanufactured Tobacco Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and...

Quick Updates: