Challenge to assessment order levying 100% penalty was dismissed ...

High Court dismissed challenge to 100% penalty order u/s 74 GST law. Limited scope under Art 226. No relief. Raise grievances via appellate remedy.

Case Laws GST

July 22, 2024

Challenge to assessment order levying 100% penalty was dismissed by High Court. Court held that impugned orders u/s 74 of GST enactments do not warrant interference under Article 226 due to limited scope. No extenuating reasons to extend relief to petitioner. Petitioner can raise grievances before Appellate Authority under GST enactments hierarchy.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Challenge to assessment order levying 100% penalty was dismissed ...

High Court dismissed challenge to 100% penalty order u/s 74 GST law. Limited scope under Art 226. No relief. Raise grievances via appellate remedy.

Case Laws GST

July 22, 2024

You may also like:

MEANING AND SCOPE OF ‘SUPPLY’ UNDER MODEL GST LAW - Goods and Services Tax - GST

The case pertains to the scope of limited scrutiny by the assessing officer regarding computation of capital gains u/s 45 and providing exemption u/s 54B of the Income...

Validity of extension of time limit for issuance of SCN under GST Act - The petitioner challenged a notification issued under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,...

Provisional attachment of cash-credit facility - Section 83 of the CGST Act - In the instant case, it relates to recovery of GST. Subsection 5 of Section 159 clearly...

The case involved the scope of limited scrutiny and the validity of a notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny to...

Petitioner challenged recovery of differential Central Excise Duty by enhancing assessable value for bought-out items directly supplied to customers. Respondents failed...

Comparable selection for determining arm's length price (ALP) adjustment. Appeals limited to including or excluding certain uncontrolled entities as comparables...

Validity of Reopening of assessment - If an assessee has to challenge the existence of the belief, the same can be done so in a proceedings under Article 226 of the...

Audit Limits - OPC,Dormant & Small companies and Private Co. having paid up capital < 100 crore out of twenty company audit limit

The High Court held that the writ petition challenging the show cause notice issued for levying GST on commission received under the Chit Funds Act is maintainable....

Private commercial transactions involving acquisition of shares in a life insurance company were challenged on allegations of fraudulent acts and undue profits. The...

Scope of Judicial Review – Review of the decision of the Settlement Commission - There is limited scope of judicial review - Despite such narrow confines of judicial...

Extension of time limits for filing annual returns under GST Acts was valid. Show Cause Notice issued within extended time limit u/s 73(9) of CGST/AGST Act for FY...

Scope of limited scrutiny - cash deposits in the Bank accounts being more than the turnover - The impugned addition made by the AO on account of profit allegedly earned...

Territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition under Article 226 (2) of the Constitution of India - even though a part of cause of action arises in this State,...

Quick Updates: