Petition challenging assessment order was allowed due to officer ...

Tax officer's dual role challenged. Court quashed orders, remanded cases for fresh hearing within 2 months with petitioner's cooperation.

Case Laws GST

July 27, 2024

Petition challenging assessment order was allowed due to officer assuming dual role as Commercial Tax Officer and State Tax Officer (Data Analytics) (Intelligence Wing) without proper explanation. Court set aside impugned orders, remitted cases to pass fresh orders on merits expeditiously within two months after hearing petitioner, who shall cooperate. If petitioner fails to cooperate, respondents can proceed based on available records.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Petition challenging assessment order was allowed due to officer ...

Tax officer's dual role challenged. Court quashed orders, remanded cases for fresh hearing within 2 months with petitioner's cooperation.

Case Laws GST

July 27, 2024

You may also like:

The Delhi High Court found a violation of natural justice principles in a case involving a cryptic order u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The...

The High Court found a violation of natural justice as no opportunity for personal hearing was provided before passing an order u/s 73 of the Goods and Services Tax Act,...

Petitioner challenged adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 regarding discrepancies in returns, short payment of tax, and excess availment of Input Tax...

Validity of assessment order and bank attachment notice - no personal hearing provided - The High court notes that the petitioner was not heard before the order issuance...

Determination of tax u/s 73(9) of the CGST/SGST Act - petitioner submits that the order is passed merely on the representation of the petitioner without giving any...

Bench Reconstitution and Order Pronouncement - Whether an order reserved by a bench could be pronounced by a reconstituted bench without considering a subsequent...

The Allahabad High Court addressed the denial of a personal hearing in a tax assessment case, emphasizing the mandatory nature of such hearings u/s 75(4) of the U.P. GST...

Validity of adjudication order - opportunity of personal hearing not provided - violation of principle of natural justice - The impugned order dated 9th May, 2021 is set...

Violation of principles of natural justice by the Adjudicating Officer/Authority in denying opportunity of hearing to appellant A.P. Parekh, who was not a member of the...

Petitioner failed to authorize representative for GST matters after registration under GST regime, resulting in show cause notice being served on auditor without...

Order set aside for violation of principles of natural justice by denying petitioner opportunity of oral hearing before passing adverse assessment order raising excess...

The High Court quashed the impugned order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax u/s 74 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, citing violation of...

The case pertains to a violation of the principles of natural justice, wherein the petitioner's right to an opportunity for personal hearing, as provided under the law,...

Jurisdictional issue regarding monetary threshold for adjudication by customs officers examined. Appellate authority rightly accepted lack of jurisdiction of original...

The petition raised issues regarding the maintainability of the appeal u/s 107 of the UPGST Act, 2017, violation of Section 75(4) of the Act, and denial of opportunity...

Quick Updates: