Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2024 Year 2024 This

CIT(A) requested exemption from depositing advance tax u/s ...


CIT(A) to conduct preliminary inquiry into assessee's claim of additional evidence before admitting appeal u/s 249(4)(b) proviso for advance tax deposit exemption.

Case Laws     Income Tax

July 29, 2024

CIT(A) requested exemption from depositing advance tax u/s 249(4)(b). Assessee demonstrated sufficient reasons for non-appearance/non-compliance before AO during reassessment proceedings. Appellate order set aside, CIT(A) directed to conduct preliminary inquiry into assessee's claim of filing additional evidence like Land Records 7/12, 8A, agricultural income proof. If prima-facie true, CIT(A) shall admit appeal as reasonable cause shown u/s 249(4)(b) proviso to seek exemption from advance tax deposit before filing appeal. CIT(A) to give written finding on admitting appeal u/s 249(4)(b) proviso. If appeal admitted, CIT(A) to adjudicate on merits as per law, pass reasoned order u/s 250(6), admit additional evidence, state points for determination, decision, and reasoning. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Section 263 revision - derivative transactions losses - inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer (AO). Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) set aside AO's order for...

  2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee's appeal and admitted additional evidence. The assessee did not disclose income from other sources, which...

  3. The Appellate Tribunal considered an ex-parte assessment u/s 144 and an application for additional evidence. The Tribunal held that since the assessment was completed...

  4. Validity of the order of the CIT(A) - Non admission of additional evidence - It is indeed the sacrosanct obligation of the first appellate authority to have ensured that...

  5. Assessing Officer conducted due enquiries regarding cash deposits during demonetization period, called for details from assessee to substantiate source. AO applied mind,...

  6. Additional evidence - rule 46A - Appellate authority should not refuse to make enquiry in the case where facts and circumstances so demand - CIT(A) directed to consider...

  7. Revision u/s 263 - For the purpose of exercising jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act, the conclusion that the order of the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of...

  8. Revision u/s 263 - As the assessment was completed after making required amount of enquiry and there was no lake of enquiry or investigation by the AO on the issues...

  9. Bogus sundry creditors - Whether CIT(A) had clearly violated the provisions of Rule 46A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, while admitting additional evidence? - The High...

  10. The ITAT Delhi held that the CIT(A) erred in not conducting a proper enquiry into the unexplained credit u/s 68. The AO and CIT(A) have a duty to investigate thoroughly....

  11. Revision u/s 263 - When the order of the AO suffers from a complete lack of enquiry, then the above said principle has no application due to the obvious reason that the...

  12. Assessee obtained loans from two corporate entities to purchase properties. AO treated these loans as unexplained cash credits u/s 68, relying solely on third-party...

  13. Dishonour of Cheque - Whether the learned MM in the present cases has conducted an preliminary / necessary inquiry u/s 202 of the CrPC before issuance of summons to the...

  14. Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - second revisional jurisdiction of Pr. CIT - Whether the AO (called second AO) has not conducted enquiry while framing re-assessment...

  15. AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates