Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2024 Year 2024 This

Validity of notice issued u/s 73 of the U.P. Goods and Services ...


Petitioner's reply to GST notice not considered, violating natural justice. Court orders fresh consideration of petitioner's own case.

Case Laws     GST

July 31, 2024

Validity of notice issued u/s 73 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 challenged due to non-consideration of petitioner's reply, violating principles of natural justice. Court held petitioner's grievance valid as notice contained facts and figures relating to unrelated entity. Directed respondent to consider petitioner's reply regarding its own company and mismatch/deficiencies, if any. Petitioner granted one week to submit detailed reply to Section 73 notice referring only to its own returns, not unrelated entity's case. Petitioner allowed to deny liability regarding notice addressed to unrelated entity. Writ petition disposed of.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Reassessment proceedings were ex-parte, violating principles of natural justice as petitioner was not provided reasonable opportunity to file reply documents due to...

  2. Assessment orders quashed due to petitioner's illness, remanded for fresh orders. Petitioner directed to file consolidated reply within 30 days. Cases remitted to...

  3. Cancellation of GST registration ab initio with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017 violated principles of natural justice as Show Cause Notice (SCN) did not specify...

  4. Reopening of assessment - Notice issued u/s 148A(b) - By not considering the reply of the Petitioner dated 31st March, 2022, the mandate of Section 148A(c) of the Act...

  5. Impugned assessment order violated principles of natural justice as petitioner was not provided further opportunity after show cause notice nine months prior....

  6. The High Court held that the show cause notice (SCN) issued for cancellation of the petitioner's Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration was vague and violated...

  7. Impugned orders were passed against petitioner without serving show cause notice or providing opportunity for personal hearing, violating principles of natural justice....

  8. The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed a petition challenging the cancellation of GST registration. The court found that the petitioner did not file a reply to the show...

  9. The impugned order was passed without considering the reply filed by the petitioner and without affording an opportunity of personal hearing, despite a request being...

  10. Validity of assessment orders - Violation of principles of natural justice - use of common portal though intended to facilitate faster service notice of orders and...

  11. SCN does not clearly reflect reasons for proposed cancellation of petitioner's GST registration, violating principles of natural justice. Show cause notice must specify...

  12. The High Court set aside an assessment order due to lack of reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to contest the tax demand on merits. The show cause notice and...

  13. Reopening of assessment - validity of notice issued u/s 148A(b) - By not considering the reply of the Petitioner dated 29th March, 2022, the mandate of Section 148A(c)...

  14. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - validity of the notice u/s 148A(b) - By not considering the reply of the Petitioner dated 31st March, 2022, the mandate of Section...

  15. Challenge to an order issued under Form GST DRC-07 for the difference in tax amount between GSTR 3B and GSTR 1. The impugned orders were passed without considering the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates