Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as Assessing Officer ...

Reopening assessment invalid-AO didn't record non-disclosure; 2nd reopening on share premium-based on impermissible change of opinion.

Case Laws Income Tax

August 1, 2024

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as Assessing Officer (AO) failed to record that assessee did not disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment. For second round of reassessment on share premium received, reopening was based on change of opinion, which is impermissible. Investigation wing's report alone is insufficient as survey statements lack evidentiary value. Failure to disclose survey details in first reopening does not constitute failure u/s 147. Decided in assessee's favor.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as Assessing Officer ...

Reopening assessment invalid-AO didn't record non-disclosure; 2nd reopening on share premium-based on impermissible change of opinion.

Case Laws Income Tax

August 1, 2024

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share premium - While recording the reasons for reopening the assessment, the AO did not even care to...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Unexplained loan - There were no justification for the A.O. to record non-existing, incorrect and wrong facts in the reasons for...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - assumption of jurisdiction by the ld. AO u/s.147 - He had categorically stated in the reasons that from the records these...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - A.O. has recorded incorrect, wrong and non-existing reasons for reopening of the assessment and also failed to verify the information...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment after four years and the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the original assessment was...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - In case incorrect, wrong and non-existing reasons are recorded by the A.O. for reopening of the assessment and A.O. failed to verify...

Reopening of assessment after four years is invalid as the recorded reasons do not mention any failure by the assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - share premium - As the reasons recorded does not quantify even an estimated amount of the alleged income which has escaped assessment...

Validity of reopening of assessment - It is well settled Law that validity of the reassessment proceedings is to be judged with reference to the reasons recorded for...

Validity of reopening assessment u/s 147 - the reopening of assessment made by the AO on irrelevant facts and on a mere reason to suspect cannot survive. We hold that...

The assessment u/s 153C mandates the recording of satisfaction by the Assessing Officer (AO) upon discovery of material likely to "have a bearing on the determination of...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed 20% of total sundry creditors in the regular assessment u/s 143(3). The AO...

The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment solely based on the information from a survey conducted by the Sales Tax Department, without independently examining...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - AO has not even made minimum exercise for ascertaining the unsecured loans accepted during the year, under consideration...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - sufficiency or inadequacy of reasons - There is no whisper in the impugned order as regards any failure on the part of petitioner to...

Quick Updates: