Regulation 17 of CBLR, 2018 prescribes procedure for revoking ...

Reg 17 CBLR mandates cross-exam rights; denial requires reasons. Statements u/s 108 questionable, cross-exam vital. Customs Broker not liable for employee's acts.

Case Laws Customs

August 7, 2024

Regulation 17 of CBLR, 2018 prescribes procedure for revoking license or imposing penalty. Department relied upon statements of witnesses. Right of cross-examination recognized under Regulation 17(4) requires Inquiry Officer to give reasons for denying such right. Courts have held that unless circumstances exist where witness cannot be produced, noticee has right to cross-examine persons whose statements are relied upon. Appellant questioned integrity of statements recorded u/s 108, requiring testing through cross-examination. Despite request, no attempt made to secure witnesses' presence, violating Regulation 17(4), causing prejudice. Customs Broker and employee separate legal entities, Broker cannot be held responsible for employee's acts without appointment. Impugned order revoking Customs Broker License under Regulation 14 not sustainable. Order set aside, appeal allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Regulation 17 of CBLR, 2018 prescribes procedure for revoking ...

Reg 17 CBLR mandates cross-exam rights; denial requires reasons. Statements u/s 108 questionable, cross-exam vital. Customs Broker not liable for employee's acts.

Case Laws Customs

August 7, 2024

You may also like:

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

Customs broker's license revocation and forfeiture of security deposit due to alleged overvaluation of imported rough diamonds faced procedural irregularities. CESTAT...

Right to obtain copies of statements recorded u/s 108 of CA - The statements cannot be termed as documents produced in or in the custody of the court, copies of which...

Penalty under Customs Broker Licensing Regulation (CBLR) 2013 for violation of Regulation 17(9). Appellant not directly involved in act or omission by authorized...

Principles of natural justice (audi alterem partem) - whether the adjudicating authority was right in refusing an opportunity of cross-examination of natural persons...

Wrong classification of goods - Cigar or Cigarette - cross-examination of witnesses - it is incumbent on the adjudicating authority to cross examine the persons whose...

Fourth Bi-monthly Monetary Policy Statement, 2016-17

Evidence - It is a settled law that the statement recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act is a material piece of evidence and can be used as substantive evidence....

Interpretation of statute - Section 108 as well as Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 - smuggling - psychotropic substance - Alprazolam - fictitious and...

Absolute Confiscation - penalty - town seizure - Smuggling - illicit transport of Gold - burden to prove - The CESTAT found the statements recorded from the employees at...

Seeking stay of orders of freezing of the accounts of the petitioner - Money laundering - The singular absence of statements of reasons or the basis of an apprehension,...

Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained cash deposits - statement of the assessee admitting the income at the time of survey - subsequent retraction made by assessee - it is not...

Valuation - Reliance on the statement made before the customs officers - recording of statement u/s 108 - Certainly a statement recorded under duress or coercion cannot...

Clarification for re-imports through Post under notification No. 45/17-Cus, dated 30.06.17 and 46/17-cus, dated 30.06.17 - reg.

Levy of penalty u/s 114 - corroborative evidences like statements of the co-noticees - it is clear that the statements of a person made under Section 108 of the Act 1962...

Quick Updates: