Validity of reopening of assessment questioned due to errors in ...

Assessment reopened with errors in notice, alleging non-filing of return. Court rules in favor of assessee, criticizes AO's inconsistent approach.

Case Laws Income Tax

August 7, 2024

Validity of reopening of assessment questioned due to errors in original notice. Notice alleged non-filing of return, later contradicted. AO failed to evaluate return before alleging income escape. AO's opinion on income taxation not based on due process. DTAA benefits not part of original notice. Final order relied on assessment from prior year. Allotment of shares under scheme not considered. Reassessment reasons must be consistent. Petitioner refuted remittances, claimed DTAA exemption. AO's denial of treaty benefits without original basis not valid. Court ruled in favor of assessee, criticizing AO's inconsistent approach.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of reopening of assessment questioned due to errors in ...

Assessment reopened with errors in notice, alleging non-filing of return. Court rules in favor of assessee, criticizes AO's inconsistent approach.

Case Laws Income Tax

August 7, 2024

You may also like:

Validity of reopening of assessment - notice against non existent entity / amalgamated company - Notices issued.

Reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 - failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) - reopening of assessment is not valid as the Income Tax Department has power to conduct the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Period of limitation - The audit party is entitled to point out a factual error or omission in the assessment. reopening of the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was based on reasons to believe the difference between total cash sales and cash sales reflected in books. Held: Reopening was made only...

The High Court quashed the reopening notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 for reassessment beyond the period of four years. The assessee had filed returns...

The High Court held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 was not valid where the Assessing Officer had previously examined the claim for deduction of foreign exchange...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - When the A.O. admits in the notice under section 142(1) Dated 20.10.2014 that assessee filed return of income under section 148 of the...

Validity of reopening of assessment - Absence of notice u/s 143(2) - non-issuance of notice shall not vitiate the assessment proceedings after due service of notice u/s 147 - HC

Reopening of assessment u/s 147- non-issue of notice u/s. 143(2) - Non filing of ITR within thirty days after issue of notice u/s. 148 - though the assessee did not file...

Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless...

Reopening of assessment - scope of reasons recorded for reopening of assessment - allegation of non filing of return to disclose income from house property but actual...

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

Assessment completed u/s 143(3) accepting assessee's return, which included export incentive and foreign exchange fluctuation as other business income. Subsequently,...

Non-service of mandatory notice u/s 143(2) renders assessment proceedings void ab initio. Revenue failed to prove sending of notice by ordinary post/registered post or...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed 20% of total sundry creditors in the regular assessment u/s 143(3). The AO...

Quick Updates: