Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

Difference between purchase value and value determined by ...


Purchase value vs. District Valuation Officer's value differed <10%. Transacted amount within tolerance limit. No addition warranted u/s 56(2)(x)(b)(B)(ii).

Case Laws     Income Tax

August 9, 2024

Difference between purchase value and value determined by District Valuation Officer though more than 5% but below 10% of purchase consideration, transacted amount within tolerance limit. Assessee eligible for benefit of 10% margin difference in valuation between value determined by stamp duty authority and declared sale consideration. If variation between two values within 10% range, no addition warranted u/s 56(2)(x)(b)(B)(ii). Since variation 9.14%, no addition tenable. Addition by Assessing Officer deleted. Ground allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The assessee purchased agricultural land whose stamp duty valuation was lower than the actual purchase consideration. The authorities sought to invoke section 56(2)(x)...

  2. The assessee objected to the valuation report prepared by the district valuation officer and the stamp duty rate. The assessing officer referred the matter to the...

  3. The provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(b) read with Section 50C cannot be invoked as the difference between the Fair Market Value (FMV) determined by the District...

  4. In the case of 2024 (5) TMI 1132 before the ITAT Mumbai, the issue pertained to penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) concerning the estimation of income on bogus purchases....

  5. Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - purchase of immovable property on less than stamp duty value - it was incumbent upon the AO to refer the matter to the District Valuation Officer

  6. Excess premium charged on issue of shares u/s.56(2)(viib) - The value adopted by the Assessing Officer under net asset value method even though a prescribed method does...

  7. u/s 56(2)(vii)(b), the addition was made based on the difference between the stated value and the District Valuation Officer's (DVO) valuation. It was held that an...

  8. The case pertains to the rejection of self-assessed value of imported aluminium scrap and determination of the method for valuation. The key points are: rejection of the...

  9. Valuation of goods - Related person - transaction value is influenced being related person - the adjudicating authority has rightly loaded the value 10% on the...

  10. Dispute regarding valuation of imported goods under Customs Valuation Rules. Related parties involved, 10% loading applied to transaction value earlier. New Customs...

  11. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the addition made u/s 56(2)(viib) for the difference between the market value and consideration received for shares...

  12. Valuation of imported goods - Higher values available on contemporaneous imports NIDB/DGOV data on similar good - The valuation of similar goods depends on factors such...

  13. Valuation of imports from related suppliers and the inclusion or exclusion of royalty in the transaction value. The key points are: Rule 10(1)(c) of the Customs...

  14. Revocation of customs broker license - Appellant is not a valuation expert and had played no role in the under valuation of the goods. The appellant acted purely on the...

  15. Customs Broker license revocation, security deposit forfeiture, and penalty imposition under Regulations 10(a), (d), (e), and (n) of CBLR challenged. Regulation 10(a)...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates