AO disallowed professional fees paid to doctors citing lack of ...

AO disallowed professional fees; CIT(A) allowed based on evidence. Tribunal upheld CIT(A). No disallowance u/s 14A for investments. Tribunal deleted disallowance of admin expenses u/s 14A r/w Rule 8D.

Case Laws Income Tax

August 9, 2024

AO disallowed professional fees paid to doctors citing lack of evidence regarding their role as consultants, researchers or advisors. CIT(A) deleted disallowance noting assessee provided logbook, agreements, summary sheets, brochures, manuals and research papers. Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s order. Regarding disallowance u/s 14A for investments, assessee had sufficient funds as evident from bank statement showing share capital proceeds and mutual fund investments. Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowance. For administrative expenses disallowed u/s 14A read with Rule 8D, Tribunal opined AO and CIT(A) failed to record dissatisfaction before applying Rule 8D's third component relating to administrative expenses.

View Source

← Previous Next →

AO disallowed professional fees paid to doctors citing lack of ...

AO disallowed professional fees; CIT(A) allowed based on evidence. Tribunal upheld CIT(A). No disallowance u/s 14A for investments. Tribunal deleted disallowance of admin expenses u/s 14A r/w Rule 8D.

Case Laws Income Tax

August 9, 2024

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues in the case. The AO made additions based on uncorroborated documents seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that...

Assessee surrendered income during survey u/s 133A as unaccounted professional receipts, which AO accepted as professional income taxable at normal rates. PCIT invoked...

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 due to the assessee providing bogus accommodation loss entries. The AO had reasons to believe in the...

Legality of the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding the gain on sale of agricultural land, based on the alleged understatement of consideration paid....

Valuation by DVO - addition based on estimated cost disregarding actual cost as per books - applicability of section 142A before amendment - non-rejection of books - AO...

The assessee failed to deduct tax on professional fees paid to various non-residents. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the fees were liable to tax in India under the...

Assessee voluntarily declared income under "income from other sources" in return. AO disallowed deduction claimed for coordination and settlement expenses due to lack of...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

Deduction u/s 80IAB on the disallowance of depreciation on Water-use Rights (Intangibles Asset) - The Tribunal acknowledged the payment made by the assessee for...

Source of cash deposit during demonetization period - AO has not refuted or discredited these evidences and documents. AO does not mention why he is not accepting these...

The ITAT Hyderabad held that the addition of bogus purchases based on information from the Investigation Wing was not justified. The burden of proof shifted to the AO...

Valuation of imported goods - electronic goods including branded and non - The tribunal held that the adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to...

Appellate Tribunal examined disallowance of claim for futures and options (F&O) loss by Assessing Officer (AO) based on report alleging stock brokers manipulated...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of addition u/s 68 for alleged bogus LTCG from sale of shares. The Tribunal noted that the transactions were conducted on a...

Quick Updates: