Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

Petitioner did not have reasonable opportunity to contest tax ...


Tax demand set aside due to GSTR mismatch. 10% tax payable in 2 weeks, reply to show cause allowed.

Case Laws     GST

August 10, 2024

Petitioner did not have reasonable opportunity to contest tax demand due to mismatch between turnover in GSTR 3B and GSTR 1. Impugned order set aside on condition petitioner remits 10% of disputed tax demand within two weeks and permitted to submit reply to show cause notice within said period. Petition disposed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Principles of natural justice violated as petitioner was not provided reasonable opportunity to contest tax demand due to unawareness of proceedings entrusted to...

  2. The court set aside the impugned order pertaining to tax demand arising from mismatch between GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated GSTR 2A, subject to petitioner remitting...

  3. Violation of principles of natural justice - petitioner unable to contest tax demand as consultant failed to inform about proceedings - examining impugned order, tax...

  4. Impugned assessment order violated principles of natural justice as petitioner was not provided further opportunity after show cause notice nine months prior....

  5. Non-issuance of ASMT-10 notice vitiated scrutiny conclusions but not adjudication as petitioner was provided opportunity to show cause - Tax proposal confirmed due to...

  6. The High Court set aside an assessment order due to lack of reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to contest the tax demand on merits. The show cause notice and...

  7. Validity of assessment order - reply to the ASTM-10 notice was not taken into consideration - violation of principles of natural justice - Acknowledging the importance...

  8. The court held that the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the department due to discrepancy between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A violated principles of natural...

  9. The High Court addressed an issue where the petitioner couldn't upload a reply to a show cause notice (SCN) regarding discrepancies between their GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B...

  10. Show cause notice served on petitioner by uploading in GST portal tab without other communication mode; petitioner unaware of proceedings; tax demand confirmed due to...

  11. In a High Court case, the petitioner challenged an order due to inability to respond to show cause notice or participate in proceedings because of cancer diagnosis....

  12. Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1...

  13. Principles of natural justice violated due to improper service of show cause notice (SCN). SCN and impugned order uploaded on GST portal, but mismatch between GSTR-7 and...

  14. The court held that the petitioner was denied the principles of natural justice by not being given a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits regarding...

  15. The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, and excess availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The petitioner...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates