Petitioner challenged impugned order regarding GST ...

Petitioner gets relief on GST turnover discrepancy due to lack of personal hearing; remanded with condition to pay 10% demand.

Case Laws GST

August 22, 2024

Petitioner challenged impugned order regarding GST discrepancies, failing to avail opportunity of personal hearing. Court held that notice was issued by respondent based on difference between turnover reported in Form 26AS and Form GSTR 3B. Petitioner replied that difference occurred as Form 26AS includes turnover from April 2017 to June 2017, prior to GST regime, while GSTR3B excluded that period. However, respondent did not consider this aspect while passing impugned order. Court believes granting another opportunity would allow petitioner to establish case before authorities. Impugned order dated 12.12.2023 set aside, matter remanded to respondent for fresh consideration on condition that petitioner pays 10% of demand amount within four weeks from 12.08.2024. Setting aside of impugned order effective from date of payment. Petition disposed by way of remand.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Petitioner challenged impugned order regarding GST ...

Petitioner gets relief on GST turnover discrepancy due to lack of personal hearing; remanded with condition to pay 10% demand.

Case Laws GST

August 22, 2024

You may also like:

Petitioner failed to authorize representative for GST matters after registration under GST regime, resulting in show cause notice being served on auditor without...

Violation of the principles of natural justice - The petitioners asserted that since an adverse decision was made against them without a personal hearing, it was in...

Validity of demand - order has been passed without proper notice to petitioner - Before passing any order, a personal hearing shall be given to petitioner with atleast...

Procedure for assessment - scope of e-Assessment Scheme - A link for personal hearing shall be sent to the petitioner and the petitioner shall be heard within a period...

Recovery notices and bank attachment orders - No opportunity of being heard - discrepancies between the GSTR 3B return and the GSTR 2B return - The High Court observed...

Denial of specific request for personal hearing - The High Court noted that the petitioner had indeed expressed a legitimate difficulty in availing the opportunity for a...

Challenge to summary order passed against the petitioner u/s 74 - The court rejected the petitioner's claim of not being granted a personal hearing, stating that the...

Cancellation of petitioner’s GST registration - fraudulent purchase - The High Court quashed the Show Cause notice (SCN) which proposed to cancel the petitioner's GST...

The case pertains to a violation of the principles of natural justice, wherein the petitioner's right to an opportunity for personal hearing, as provided under the law,...

The court held that the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice as no opportunity of personal hearing was provided to the petitioner...

Recovery notice - Validity of assessment orders - The High court observed that while personal hearings were offered to the petitioner, it was evident that the petitioner...

Petitioner's NRO account deposits were subject to TDS deduction; transferred shares from deceased wife's account not taxable. Respondents classified petitioner as...

Validity of reopening of assessment - Re-opening notice u/s 148A(d) - personal hearing refused - the High court concluded that Section 148A(b) does not mandate a...

The High Court considered the validity of an assessment order cancelling the petitioner's GST registration. The petitioner lacked access to the GST portal and was...

Violation of principles of natural justice by not granting opportunity of personal hearing before issuing adjudication order demanding excess availment of Input Tax...

Quick Updates: