The High Court quashed the orders passed by the respondent ...

Tribunal orders set aside for lack of fair hearing, remanded for reconsideration on payment of 10% disputed tax demand.

Case Laws GST

September 2, 2024

The High Court quashed the orders passed by the respondent assessing officer for violating principles of natural justice by not providing an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, despite the petitioner seeking additional time to file replies to show cause notices. The Court remanded the matters back to the respondent for fresh consideration after setting aside the impugned orders, subject to the petitioner paying 10% of the disputed tax demand for each assessment year within six weeks. The case pertained to discrepancies in Input Tax Credits for multiple assessment years from 2018-19 to 2022-23, wherein show cause notices were issued through an online portal, and the petitioner had filed replies but was denied a personal hearing before passing of final orders.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court quashed the orders passed by the respondent ...

Tribunal orders set aside for lack of fair hearing, remanded for reconsideration on payment of 10% disputed tax demand.

Case Laws GST

September 2, 2024

You may also like:

The High Court reviewed an assessment order challenged for being unreasoned. The Court found that the order lacked proper reasoning as it confirmed the tax proposal...

Bench Reconstitution and Order Pronouncement - Whether an order reserved by a bench could be pronounced by a reconstituted bench without considering a subsequent...

In a High Court case, the petitioner challenged an order due to inability to respond to show cause notice or participate in proceedings because of cancer diagnosis....

The High Court considered a challenge to an order u/s WBGST Act due to a 32-day delay in filing an appeal and non-deposit of pre-deposit. The petitioner provided...

Principles of natural justice violated due to lack of proper communication regarding show cause notice and order, leading to tax demand confirmation without petitioner's...

Impugned order suffers from non-application of mind, violation of principles of natural justice. Tribunal failed to consider grounds raised by petitioner for delay in...

The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not given a fair opportunity to contest a tax demand. The tax proposal was upheld due to the...

Petitioner challenged ineligibility for Input Tax Credit (ITC) on certain commodities as per Section 17(5) of GST statutes and ITC on supplies from cancelled dealers....

Legality of the penalty orders and assessment orders - as the assessment orders for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 were based on the penalty orders for the...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the rejection of the application for registration u/s 80G(5) due to non-receipt of order by the assessee-trust. The Tribunal noted that...

Petitioner challenged impugned order regarding GST discrepancies, failing to avail opportunity of personal hearing. Court held that notice was issued by respondent based...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the liability of a Municipal Corporation for services, including 'Renting of Immovable Property Services', while performing sovereign...

The respondent denied Input Tax Credit (ITC) to the petitioner based on alleged purchase of goods under HSN 85171110, non-payment to creditors exceeding 180 days, and...

The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, and excess availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The petitioner...

The ITAT held that the disallowance of exemption claimed u/s 10(23C)(vi) due to a clerical error in the income tax return was improper. The order u/s 154 by CPC violated...

Quick Updates: