Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

The assessee had made purchases from M/s. HJM Fuels Pvt. Ltd., ...


Legitimate purchases wrongly treated as bogus; evidence disregarded by tax dept.

Case Laws     Income Tax

September 3, 2024

The assessee had made purchases from M/s. HJM Fuels Pvt. Ltd., which the Department treated as bogus and added a profit element. The assessee pointed out discrepancies in the incriminating material found from the accommodation entry provider, M/s. HJM Fuels Pvt. Ltd., during the survey. The assessee filed a detailed reply, providing evidence of the genuineness of the transactions, including copies of purchase bills, VAT returns, Form No. 26AS, and quantitative tally of purchases and sales. The Director of M/s. HJM Fuels Pvt. Ltd. submitted an affidavit admitting to the transactions with the assessee, which the Assessing Officer acknowledged. However, the Assessing Officer relied on the incriminating material without providing reasons for disregarding the assessee's evidence. The Tribunal held that the incriminating material lacked credibility and evidentiary value, and the Department failed to controvert the assessee's contentions. Consequently, the addition of the profit element on the purchases was not sustainable, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition u/s 68 as accommodation entries - long term capital gain on sale of shares as sham/bogus transaction - Mere suspicion cannot be a ground for treating the...

  2. Bogus purchase bills from certain ‘hawala’ dealers - The Tribunal found the assessee failed to substantiate the genuineness of the purchases from alleged Hawala dealers,...

  3. Estimation of income - bogus purchases - quantification of profit - The Tribunal noted that during investigations, the alleged suppliers were identified as bogus...

  4. Confiscation of the gold bars - remelted gold of foreign origin or not - The admissibility and weight of retracted statements - The Tribunal found that the appellants...

  5. Additions towards Bogus purchases - Estimation of profit - Purchases are to be removed, the corresponding sale is also required to be removed from the profit and loss...

  6. Taxability of Bogus purchase - Estimation of profit - in cases where purchases are not proved with necessary evidences, only profit element embedded on those purchases...

  7. Addition of bogus purchases - There is no doubt that these parties are non-existent - purchase bills from these non-existent the/bogus parties cannot be taken as cogent...

  8. Bogus purchase - purchase bills from these non-existent the/bogus parties cannot be taken as cogent evidence of purchases, in light of the overwhelming evidence the...

  9. Estimation of income - bogus purchases - The Tribunal considered the facts surrounding the alleged bogus purchases. Despite the inability of the assessee to establish...

  10. Reassessment u/s 147 - bogus purchases - When the investigation wing has received specific information from another gov. Dept. that assessee has indulged in hawala...

  11. Addition of bogus purchases - reopening u/s 147 - if the source of purchases are from the books and through account payee cheque, then how such purchases can be treated...

  12. Addition of bogus purchases - The CIT (A) came to the conclusion that it is a case of purchases from gray market and thereafter, bills have been procured from hawala...

  13. Addition u/s 69C - bogus purchases - Enquiries conducted by the AO prove the fact that purchases from the above parties are bogus which are not supported by necessary...

  14. Addition u/s 69C - bogus purchases of diamonds - The decision emphasizes the principle that where the genuineness of purchases is in question, but corresponding sales...

  15. The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates