Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

The appellant had furnished all relevant documents, including ...


Customs duty assessment case: Proper documents furnished, no misdeclaration found.

Case Laws     Customs

September 7, 2024

The appellant had furnished all relevant documents, including inspection certificates, test certificates containing composition of alloys, and invoices, along with the Bills of Entry. The correct classification of goods was arrived at by DRI based on these submitted documents. The goods were not mis-declared, and the declarations in the Bills of Entry were as per the invoices. Even in the statement recorded by DRI, it was stated that the same goods were procured indigenously, and Indian manufacturers also classified them under the same heading as declared in the Bills of Entry, which was not controverted by the department. Therefore, the charge of mis-declaration and suppression of facts fails. Since the onus of assessment was on the department and the appellant had submitted the necessary documents, they cannot be held responsible for suggesting a certain classification heading in the Bill of Entry. The demand has to be restricted to the normal period, and the penalty needs to be set aside. The impugned order is modified accordingly.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Misdeclaration of imported polished marble slabs as unpolished slabs. Excess quantity found during physical verification. Customs duty demanded along with interest and...

  2. In this case, the High Court addressed the issue of a rejected refund claim due to being time-barred. The key determination was the relevant date for calculating the...

  3. Recovery of differential duty (SAD) u/s 28(1) of CA for the imports made in all the Bills of Entry along with interest and penalties - The Tribunal confirmed the...

  4. Penalty of penalty for abetment of the fraudulent export scheme - The appellant was accused of misdeclaration and fraudulent export of ready-made garments in order to...

  5. Levy of penalty for delay in Submission of Documents - finalization of the provisional assessments - The Tribunal acknowledged the delay in document submission but noted...

  6. Assessment passed u/s.153A - Presumption in case of seized documents - Assessee’s son was also covered under the search in the same premises and the document found from...

  7. Levy of Penalty u/s 112 (a) and (b) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - Abetment in mis-declaration of goods and evasion of duty - The appellants were accused of being...

  8. Demand of customs duty invoking extended period of limitation - the Tribunal noted that the appellant had provided all relevant information and documents at the time of...

  9. DFIA scheme - exemption from basic customs duty and additional customs duty - introduction of new condition by way of amendment - The tribunal held that, the amendment...

  10. Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - validity of reason to believe - during the scrutiny assessment, the case was discussed with the assessee on four dates,...

  11. Levy of penalty on Customs Broker - Accepting documents without proper authorization - The Department argued that this constituted abetment of the export of prohibited...

  12. Retrospective exemption granted from payment of any customs duty on import of "Rough diamonds (industrial or non-industrial)" for the period 1.7.2017 to 1.2.2022....

  13. Exemption from IGST - Re-import of aircrafts and parts thereof after repairs - the meaning assigned to duty of customs, as discussed above, is the meaning assigned to...

  14. Demand of customs duty based on mis-declaration of weight of imported rough A marble blocks - The Tribunal observed that, it is found that the department established a...

  15. Export of goods without payment of duty - procedure not followed - demand was raised for non-furnishing of export documents - appellants has to be pay the duty for...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates