The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the ...

Tax return discrepancy: Court orders fresh hearing after paying 10% disputed amount as security.

Case Laws GST

September 10, 2024

The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the petitioner deposits 10% of the disputed tax amount within 30 days as security. The case pertained to discrepancies between the GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns filed by the petitioner. The petitioner had already paid tax but sought an opportunity to be heard and expressed willingness to deposit an additional 10% of the disputed tax from the electronic cash register as security.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the ...

Tax return discrepancy: Court orders fresh hearing after paying 10% disputed amount as security.

Case Laws GST

September 10, 2024

You may also like:

The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, and excess availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The petitioner...

Petitioner challenged adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 regarding discrepancies in returns, short payment of tax, and excess availment of Input Tax...

Validity of assessment order and bank attachment notice - no personal hearing provided - The High court notes that the petitioner was not heard before the order issuance...

Benefit of accumulation of income u/s.11(2) - denial of claim on non-submission of Form No.10 along with return of income - In this case, the assessee claims that...

Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act - VSV Act - settlement of the dispute of petitioner for assessment year 2015-16 without withdrawing the interest already granted under...

Maintainability of appeal - ITAT dismissed the appeal on the ground of low tax effect being less than 10 lakhs - Board Circular No.21/2015 - Determination of tax effect...

The High Court considered the validity of an assessment order cancelling the petitioner's GST registration. The petitioner lacked access to the GST portal and was...

Disparity between the petitioner's GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B returns - error occurred on account of reflecting an amount wrongly towards CGST and SGST instead of IGST - Despite...

Stay - Waiver of pre-deposit - power of Appellate Authority to insist on the assessee paying more than 20% of the disputed tax - Unless the assessee remits 20% of the...

Refund of Tax - a deemed acceptance of the return of income furnished by the assessee stands and holds good and consequently, any tax paid either along with the return...

The court interpreted provisions of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 and the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation (Local Body Tax) Rules, clarifying the...

Non-service of show cause notice violated principles of natural justice. Respondent imposed tax liability without providing opportunity and documents to petitioner for...

Input Tax Credit - The learned Single Judge was justified in dismissing the writ petitions as the appellant was claiming input tax credit based upon Form VAT 240 and by...

SVLDRS - The dispute revolves around whether 50% of the amount paid by the petitioner under the Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013, should be...

Deduction u/s. 80IB(10) - non filling of return on time - the ITAT held that the return filed beyond the due date cannot claim deduction under section 80IB(10) as per...

Quick Updates: