The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging ...

Tax dispute over GSTR mismatch & excess ITC claims; HC remands case for fresh review after 10% disputed tax paid.

Case Laws GST

September 10, 2024

The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, and excess availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The petitioner agreed to pay 10% of the disputed tax to file reply/objections with supporting documents. The High Court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, subject to the petitioner paying 10% of the disputed tax within four weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging ...

Tax dispute over GSTR mismatch & excess ITC claims; HC remands case for fresh review after 10% disputed tax paid.

Case Laws GST

September 10, 2024

You may also like:

The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the...

Advance Ruling application on maintainability - Reversal of input tax credit to extent of tax element in credit note - no agreement between parties on credit notes not...

Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as petitioner's contentions were not considered - mismatch between petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated...

Petitioner challenged order u/s 74 of TNGST Act, 2017 for assessment year 2017-18 due to mismatch between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A regarding input tax credit....

The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders due to a mismatch in returns filed by the petitioner in GSTR 01 and GSTR 3B. The court found a violation of...

The court held that the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the department due to discrepancy between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A violated principles of natural...

The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax...

Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1...

In a High Court case, the petitioner challenged an order due to inability to respond to show cause notice or participate in proceedings because of cancer diagnosis....

Validity of assessment order - mismatch between the GSTR 3B returns filed by the petitioner and the auto-populated GSTR 2A returns - The High court acknowledged the...

Petition challenging assessment order set aside; case remanded to pass fresh order after considering discrepancies between GSTR-1, GSTR-3B, GSTR-2A/GSTR-9; petitioner...

Reversal of ITC - wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on Car - The petitioner contended that despite reversing the ITC in the GSTR 3B return, the impugned order...

Demand of GST - Discrepancy between the GSTR-3B returns and the auto populated GSTR-2A returns - The court observed that the tax demand solely pertained to the disparity...

Liability of tax arising on account of inadvertent error - mismatch between the petitioner's GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B returns The High Court noted the certificates from...

The court held that the petitioner was denied the principles of natural justice by not being given a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits regarding...

Quick Updates: