The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging ...

Tax dispute over GSTR mismatch & excess ITC claims; HC remands case for fresh review after 10% disputed tax paid.

Case Laws GST

September 10, 2024

The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, and excess availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The petitioner agreed to pay 10% of the disputed tax to file reply/objections with supporting documents. The High Court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, subject to the petitioner paying 10% of the disputed tax within four weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging ...

Tax dispute over GSTR mismatch & excess ITC claims; HC remands case for fresh review after 10% disputed tax paid.

Case Laws GST

September 10, 2024

You may also like:

Advance Ruling application on maintainability - Reversal of input tax credit to extent of tax element in credit note - no agreement between parties on credit notes not...

Petitioner challenged impugned orders, recovery notices and bank attachment notice due to mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. Court accepted petitioner's contention of...

The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the...

Remand order issued in case concerning refund of accumulated input tax credit (ITC) for zero-rated supply due to mismatch in ITC as per GSTR-2B and GSTR-3B. Adjudicating...

Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as petitioner's contentions were not considered - mismatch between petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated...

The court set aside the impugned order passed by the respondent u/s 73 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 2017, imposing a liability of Rs. 10.72 lakhs towards...

Petitioner challenged order u/s 74 of TNGST Act, 2017 for assessment year 2017-18 due to mismatch between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A regarding input tax credit....

The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders due to a mismatch in returns filed by the petitioner in GSTR 01 and GSTR 3B. The court found a violation of...

The court held that the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the department due to discrepancy between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A violated principles of natural...

Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1...

The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax...

Petition challenging assessment order set aside; case remanded to pass fresh order after considering discrepancies between GSTR-1, GSTR-3B, GSTR-2A/GSTR-9; petitioner...

In a High Court case, the petitioner challenged an order due to inability to respond to show cause notice or participate in proceedings because of cancer diagnosis....

Validity of assessment order - mismatch between the GSTR 3B returns filed by the petitioner and the auto-populated GSTR 2A returns - The High court acknowledged the...

Tax assessment proceedings involving GSTR 3B returns mismatch with auto-populated GSTR 2A. Disputed tax demand partially recovered through bank appropriation exceeding...

Quick Updates: