Wrongful availment and passing on of input tax credit, wrongful ...

Dismissal of plea against tax evasion proceedings, refund misuse.

Case Laws GST

September 13, 2024

Wrongful availment and passing on of input tax credit, wrongful availment of IGST refund under Advance Authorisation scheme. Constitutional validity of Notification No. 09/2023-Central Tax dated 31.03.2023 questioned, whether ultra-vires the CGST Act provisions. Held that the challenged order is dated 21.02.2024, and the challenge is on merits. Appeal lies before the Appellate Authority u/s 107 of the CGST Act to examine questions of fact and law. The petition regarding the impugned orders is not entertained. Regarding initiation of proceedings u/s 74 instead of Section 73 of the CGST Act, the Appellate Authority can examine the questions of law while examining the facts. The challenge to the notification dated 31.03.2023 does not arise as no notice was issued u/s 73 of the CGST Act. The present petition is misconceived and dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Wrongful availment and passing on of input tax credit, wrongful ...

Dismissal of plea against tax evasion proceedings, refund misuse.

Case Laws GST

September 13, 2024

You may also like:

Prosecution Proceedings initiated u/s 276C - Bogus LTCG - guilty mind i.e., mens rea - willful evasion of tax on claims made under the head LTCG/Short Term Capital Loss...

Refund claim in respect of excess paid duty - proceeding of rebate and proceeding of refund are two different proceedings - appellant have rightly claimed the refund of...

Offence u/s 276(C)(2) and 277 - Allegation of willful tax evasion and non-payment of admitted tax - compounding application. The petitioner submitted income tax return...

Prosecution u/s 276C (2) - petitioners had delayed to pay self-assessment tax - The High Court held that delayed payment of income tax does not amount to tax evasion if...

Tax planning versus Tax evasion - The Assessing Officer cannot disregard a transaction just because it results in a tax advantage to the assessee. Just as much as we...

The High Court held that once a proper officer initiates proceedings on a subject matter under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) or the Haryana...

The case involves a challenge to a refund claim for service tax u/s unjust enrichment principles. CESTAT held that refund can only be granted based on the assessment...

Detention of goods alongwith penalty - Expired e-way Bill - The High Court noted that the goods were indeed covered by a tax invoice and e-way bill, with the expiration...

Dismissal of refund claim - Export of goods - If the refund of service tax paid on input services is not allowed to the appellant then the said taxes would have to be...

Refund of accumulated Input Tax Credit - inverted duty structure - Under Clause (i) of the proviso to Section 54(3) of the CGST Act, refund of ITC is available in cases...

Claim of Refund - Post GST, on demand, appellant paid service tax under reverse charge basis and claim refund as the same is eligible as Input Tax Credit under the...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Refund of Service Tax - time limitation - Exercise of power u/s 142(3) of GST Act for refund of service tax - The case involves the rejection of a refund claim by the...

Refund of service tax - amount have been deposited by mistake - Form 26AS, VAT-41, copies of challans and copies of running bills prepared by the Housing Board showing...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Quick Updates: