Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

The adjudicating authority classified the goods 'Bleach-9' ...


Tariff classification dispute: Bleaching clay termed 'raw clay' attracts NIL duty.

Case Laws     Central Excise

September 14, 2024

The adjudicating authority classified the goods 'Bleach-9' manufactured by the assessee under chapter sub-heading 25.05, claiming NIL rate of duty, based on technical opinions stating it is raw clay/washed clay and not Activated Clay/Earth. The opinions mentioned that clay washed with water and dried is not termed 'Activated Clay,' and its properties remain the same as natural clay. The department did not adduce any evidence contradicting these findings, which formed the basis for classifying 'Bleach-9' under Tariff heading 25.05. As no fresh evidence was provided to challenge the orders, the Appellate Tribunal dismissed the department's appeal, upholding the classification under 25.05.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Classification of imported goods - Drones - Tello drones with or without camera would merit classification under heading 9503 of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff...

  2. Tariff Classification - Whether Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Fluid (CAPD fluid) is medical equipment which attracts nil rate of custom duty - Held yes - SC

  3. Classification of goods - ball point pen ink - The Tribunal found that the Central Excise Tariff entries for ball point pen ink are not aligned with the Harmonized...

  4. The assessee-Respondent classified the aluminum circles under CTH 76069110 as raw materials, while the department proposed classification under CTH 7616, and the DRI...

  5. This case concerns the classification and duty rate applicable to food preparations sold by the appellant in sealed containers. The Revenue classified the goods under...

  6. Classification of imported goods - different categories of "IP Phones" such as (i) IP Audio Phones (ii) IP Audio Conference Phones (iii) Wireless IP Phones (iv) IP Video...

  7. 100% EOU - The Adjudicating Authority has denied the exemption Notification No. 21/2002-CUS on the ground that the raw material imported by the appellant was under “Nil”...

  8. Classification of goods - RBD Palm Stearin - there is specific Tariff Item 1511 90 30 for ‘Refined bleached deodorized palm stearin’. Therefore, the product ‘Refined...

  9. Sustainability of cess, when basic customs duty itself was Nil - contention of the department is barring the basic customs duty, other duties namely EC, SHEC and SWS...

  10. 100% EOU - demand of customs duty on the raw material imported duty free - removal of finished goods in DTA without having any permission from the Development...

  11. CENVAT Credit - duty paid on exempted goods - Classification of inputs - the ‘Shrink Sleeves’ which were inputs of the Respondents are chargeable to duty and not...

  12. GST Rates - HSN Code - Tamarind kernel falls under heading 1207 and attracts Nil GST.

  13. GST Rates - HSN Code - Maize [of seed quality] fall under heading 1005 and attract Nil GST.

  14. Classification of imported goods - Raw Jute cutting grade imported by the appellant from Bangladesh through LCS Petrapole - to be classified as raw jute cutting grade...

  15. Even if attracting nil rate of duty, the goods remain excisable and they do not become non-excisable. Therefore, just because the goods listed in the schedule attract...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates