The High Court granted relief to the petitioner by directing the ...

Tax demand discrepancies led to unlawful property attachment despite pre-deposit made, prompting court relief.

Case Laws GST

September 16, 2024

The High Court granted relief to the petitioner by directing the release of attachment over immovable properties due to discrepancies between GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated GSTR 2A. Despite making the requisite 10% pre-deposit of the disputed tax demand, the attachment was effected contrary to statutory provisions. The court held that once the pre-deposit is made u/s 107(7), recovery proceedings for the balance amount shall be deemed stayed. Consequently, the attachment of the petitioner's immovable properties was found unsustainable and ordered to be released.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court granted relief to the petitioner by directing the ...

Tax demand discrepancies led to unlawful property attachment despite pre-deposit made, prompting court relief.

Case Laws GST

September 16, 2024

You may also like:

Refund of Pre-deposit alongwith interest - Adjustment of pre-deposit with pending demand - A pre-deposit would become refundable the moment an Appellate Authority comes...

Refund claim of pre-deposit while appeal is pending - adjustment of amount was paid in lieu of pre deposit for filing the appeal before this Tribunal - Since the demand...

Manner of payment of Pre-deposit amount before filing of appeal against demand of service tax - Admissibility of payment of pre-deposit using DRC-03 - The appellant...

Waiver of pre-deposit - requirement u/s 129E - The case revolved around the appellant's failure to fulfill the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under section 129E of...

Interpretation of statute - calculation of amount of pre-deposit u/s 18 of the SARFAESI Act - 50% of which amount the borrower is required to deposit as pre-deposit -...

Demand of service tax on reverse charge basis - Payment of pre deposit done from CENVAT Credit account - the pre-deposit made is not proper - AT

The case involved the issue of pre-deposit during the pendency of appeal, applicability of Section 11B and unjust enrichment, and eligibility for interest on refund of...

Petitioner pre-deposited Rs. 6,25,000/- as condition for filing appeal u/s 51 of TNVAT Act against Assessment Order dated 21.10.2010. After revised Assessment Order on...

Maintainability of appeal - requirement of mandatory pre-deposit - after 6.8.2014 neither the Tribunal nor the Commissioner (Appeals) have the power to waive the...

Petitioner availed fake input tax credit through bogus billing, generating fake sale invoices. Provisional attachment of movable properties in addition to immovable...

Stay of demand - pre-deposit of only 20% of the disputed demand - adjustments of refunds against demand - respondent is entitled to seek pre-deposit of only 20% of the...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed issues related to money laundering, proceeds of crime from smuggling narcotics and running extortion rackets. The case involved double...

Power to waiver of mandatory pre-deposit - Section 129E does not empower the Tribunal or the Commissioner (Appeals) to waive the pre-deposit or to reduce the pre-deposit.

The order dismissing the appeal due to non-payment of the mandatory pre-deposit amount u/s 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was challenged. The court relied on a...

Interest on the pre-deposit - The Tribunal found that the issue revolved around whether the appellants were entitled to interest on the pre-deposit u/s 35FF of the...

Quick Updates: