Faceless assessment regime introduced new procedures codified ...

Procedural nuances of faceless assessment regime: Opportunities for objections, DRP's non-binding role, deletion of share capital addition. /PFContributions.

Case Laws Income Tax

September 18, 2024

Faceless assessment regime introduced new procedures codified u/s 144B for assessments u/ss 143(3), 144, and 147, while assessments u/s 144C (transfer pricing cases) followed existing procedures. Draft assessment orders issued by National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) provide opportunity for assessee's objections before finalization. Jurisdictional Assessing Officer's finalization of assessment order without NFAC involvement was an administrative measure. Dispute Resolution Panel's directions on Section 144B violations not binding on Assessing Officer. Addition u/s 68 on share capital from non-resident Associated Enterprises deleted as identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness established through remittances and previous investments. Belated remittance of employees' ESI/PF contributions disallowed based on Supreme Court's decision in Checkmate Services case.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Faceless assessment regime introduced new procedures codified ...

Procedural nuances of faceless assessment regime: Opportunities for objections, DRP's non-binding role, deletion of share capital addition. /PFContributions.

Case Laws Income Tax

September 18, 2024

You may also like:

Non consideration of objections to the draft assessment order u/s 144 - since the objections were well within time, the action of the AO in proceeding with the final...

Validity of Reopening of assessment - proceedings drawn u/s 148A commenced by the local jurisdictional officer - non adherence to procedure of faceless regime for the...

Validity of assessment order u/s. 147 r.w.s 144 - Assessee being Non-Resident Indian - The AO assessed the property below its market value, leading to an addition of...

Validity of National Faceless Assessment orders - Both the Assessees and the Assessing Officers are under tremendous pressure to meet deadlines as the Show Cause Notices...

Assessment order passed u/s 144C(2) - The assessee did not file the objections before the DRP within the prescribed time and therefore, the objections are not...

Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless...

The High Court held that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) is not permitted to issue a notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, as it would amount to a breach of...

Faceless assessment regime mandated u/s 151A - Jurisdictional Assessing Officer not permitted to issue notice u/s 148, as it would breach Section 151A provisions - No...

The High Court held that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) is not permitted to issue a notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, as it would violate the provisions...

Faceless Assessment Unit passed assessment order beyond seven days from show-cause issuance, violating natural justice principles. Submit Response Button deactivation...

The High Court ruled on the validity of an order passed u/s 144C(3) read with Section 144B. The petitioner had filed objections to the Draft Assessment Order before the...

Revision u/s 263 - Lack of enquiry - faceless assessment - in a faceless regime, normally there cannot be a case of prejudice of lack of enquiry for the reason that...

Faceless Assessment Unit failed to offer personal hearing opportunity through video conferencing despite petitioner's request as mandated u/s 144B(6)(viii). Petitioner's...

This case deals with the validity of a notice issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) in light of the provisions of Section...

Validity of assessment order u/s 144C - petitioner filed objection to the draft assessment order well within the time of thirty days before the DRP - The High Court held...

Quick Updates: