The High Court held that the Central Board of Direct Tax's ...

Tax offense compounding timelines in guidelines invalid, exceeded statutory provisions. Fresh consideration ordered.

Case Laws Income Tax

September 19, 2024

The High Court held that the Central Board of Direct Tax's Compounding Guidelines dated 16 September 2022, which rejected the application for compounding u/s 279(2) on the basis of a time frame, were invalid. Section 279(2) does not prescribe any timelines for filing an application for compounding, and the Guidelines exceeded the statutory provision by imposing a condition not contemplated by the Act. The Court set aside the order rejecting the compounding application and remanded the matter to the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) for fresh consideration, bearing in mind the observations made by the Court.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court held that the Central Board of Direct Tax's ...

Tax offense compounding timelines in guidelines invalid, exceeded statutory provisions. Fresh consideration ordered.

Case Laws Income Tax

September 19, 2024

You may also like:

The guidelines provide a comprehensive framework for compounding offenses under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The key points are: 1. Compounding is permissible for specified...

Validity of the order 278(2) - compounding of offence u/s 279(2) - Income Tax Authorities have the power to compound the offence either before or after the institution...

Compounding of offence(s) - determination of compounding fee - first occasion - 5% or 3% of the amount of tax in default - Since a common application had been filed for...

CIRP - Reimbursement of Compounding fees - Who is responsible for offence or compounding of offence under the Income Tax Act which was committed much before the...

Service Tax (Compounding of Offences) Rules, 2012 - Notification

Compounding of the offence committed for failure to pay the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) - There is no limitation prescribed - Since the applications filed by the...

Offence u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act is not compoundable u/s 320 Criminal Procedure Code. High Court erred in invoking power u/s 482 Criminal Procedure Code and...

The High Court held that the compounding application should be treated as filed on the original date of February 15, 2018, rather than September 24, 2020, as erroneously...

Compounding of offences u/s 279 - liberalisation of policy of the CBDT- applications for compounding of non-technical offences - imprisonment for less than 2 years was...

Compounding of offences and payment of compounding fee - there are no complaints and there is no inspection/investigation pending. - In the present case, the company has...

Compounding of offence - non-compliance with the CSR initiatives - for violation of provisions of section 134(3)(o) r.w.s 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 - prosecution...

Compounding of Offences - non-filing of the cost audit report - section 233B of the Companies Act, 1956 - this Tribunal has the power to compound the offence as brought...

Compounding of certain offences - to enable Tribunal to compound offences punishable with fine only or with fine or imprisonment or both - Section 441 of the Companies Act, 2013

Compounding of offences u/s 276CC – it is for the assessee to show sufficient cause or reason to support his request for the compounding of the offence - HC

Compounding of an offence committed u/s 276B, r/w. Section 287B - Period of limitation for filing compounding application - Decision of High Court holding that, the...

Quick Updates: