Petitioner challenged assessment order u/s 74 of GST enactments. ...

Father's nil returns for 2017-18 led to GST tax demand on purchases assuming sales within 18 months. Court set aside order, remanded for reconsideration.

September 20, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Petitioner challenged assessment order u/s 74 of GST enactments. Father had filed nil returns for outward supply in 2017-18. Show cause notice treated total purchase value as suppressed sales. Impugned order assumed processed turmeric must be sold within 18 months, deeming sale in February 2019 to compute tax liability. No discernible basis for such assumptions in impugned order. Impugned order set aside, matter remanded for reconsideration. Petitioner permitted to place additional documents within four weeks. Petition disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Petitioner challenged assessment order u/s 74 of GST enactments. ...

Father's nil returns for 2017-18 led to GST tax demand on purchases assuming sales within 18 months. Court set aside order, remanded for reconsideration.

September 20, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Demand of GST u/s 74 - Wrongful / excess claim of transitional credit (Tran-1) - Though the appellant has claimed state tax as transitional input tax credit, but there...

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Scrutiny of GST returns for FY 2017-18 and 2018-19

CBDT notifies new Income Tax Return Forms for AY 2017-18 - Circular

Challenge to show cause notice u/s 74 of Central/Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 regarding classification of product manufactured by petitioner under HSN...

Input Tax Credit - GST paid on goods purchased for the purpose of construction & maintenance of Warehouse - no ITC of GST paid on goods purchased for the purpose of...

Validity of revised return 139(5) - Revised return did not conform to the prescription of section 139(5), before its substitution w.e.f. A.Y. 2017-18, which provided for...

GST Revenue Collections for the Financial Year 2017-18

The High Court addressed the issue of parallel proceedings initiated by both State and Central GST Authorities against the petitioner for the same assessment years. For...

The transportation of coal (minerals) within a mining area, such as from the mining pit head or coal stockyard to the railway siding or beneficiation plant, for a...

Levy of GST - sale of plot of land - farmer having a vacant land outside the municipal area of town - The transaction/activity of the appellant is not covered under...

The works rendered by the applicant involving application of polymer protective coating for bridges, as part of construction or routine maintenance/renovation, falls...

Proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22 of CGST Rules 2017 allows revocation of GST registration cancellation u/s 29(2)(c) of CGST Act 2017 if pending returns are filed and...

Services supplied before 18.07.2022, invoices proposed for price escalation. Rate of GST 18% applicable as per Section 14(a)(i) of CGST Act, 2017 on invoices issued...

Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The petitioner's...

AAR analyzed the issue of GST levy on sewerage water treated by GVSCCL and supplied to industries. Water falls under Chapter heading 2201 of GST Tariff. Two schedule...

Quick Updates: