Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

Interpretation of Regulation 21A of IBBI (Liquidation Process) ...


Secured creditor's claim over remaining asset portion rejected after failing to realize security interest within time limit.

September 30, 2024

Case Laws     IBC     Tri

Interpretation of Regulation 21A of IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 regarding secured creditor's obligation to realize security interest within stipulated time. Regulation casts duty on secured creditor to pay liquidator estimated amount or excess realized value within prescribed timeline, failing which asset becomes part of liquidation estate. Secured creditor's contention of non-communication of estimated amount by liquidator rejected as misplaced. Law mandates secured creditor to complete realization process within 180 days, after which asset vests with liquidation estate under Regulation 21A(3). Secured creditor's belated claim over remaining property portion rejected for non-compliance with 30-day intimation requirement. Liquidator's decision upheld as per regulations. Application dismissed by Tribunal.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Secured Creditor - As in the present case, all the ‘Secured Creditors’ have claimed right over the same secured asset, which is 91% of the total secured asset and...

  2. Liquidation process - right of the secured creditor - Respondent can realise a Security Interest as per provision Section 13(9) of the SARFAESI Act. Since the Respondent...

  3. Recovery of tax dues - Attachment of assets - dues of MVAT Authorities’ have charge in priority to the secured creditors or not - This judgment reaffirms the supremacy...

  4. Priority Charge - Seeking directions to remove the order of attachment over the property of the borrower, which according to the petitioner, is mortgaged and is a...

  5. Priority to the first charge holder - Secured Creditor - relinquishment of security interest - Sub-classification inter-se the Secured Creditors in the distribution...

  6. Secured creditor has priority over Sales Tax Department for recovering dues from borrower/entity. Section 26E of SARFAESI Act and Section 38 of 2002 Act considered....

  7. Tax Recovery proceedings - priority over other dues / secured creditors - the Revenue cannot prevent the petitioner-bank as a secured creditor from realizing its unpaid...

  8. Secured creditor's priority charge over dues upheld. Section 26E of SARFAESI Act grants secured creditors priority over all other debts and taxes. Petitioner bank...

  9. Priority of secured creditors under the SARFAESI Act over claims by the Income Tax Department. The respondent mortgaged the property to the petitioner in 2013-14, prior...

  10. The NCLAT addressed issues regarding the approval of a Resolution Plan by Suraksha Realty Limited, focusing on the treatment of claims filed in the CIRP of the Corporate...

  11. Possession of the secured assets - Once all the requirements under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act are complied with/satisfied by the secured creditor, it is the duty...

  12. CIRP - Classification of Appellant as Operational Creditor and Exclusion from COC Meetings - Financial Creditor or Operational Creditor - The Supreme Court held that the...

  13. CIRP proceedings - on the basis of parity being deployed by the RP in admitting claims of both category of financial creditors, there remains no reason to be aggrieved....

  14. The case involves liquidation of a corporate debtor where a creditor sought refund of an amount with interest paid to prevent invocation of their Bank Guarantee. The...

  15. The High Court allowed the application seeking dissolution of a company (in liquidation) u/s 481 of the Companies Act, 1956. As the company had insufficient funds and no...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates