The summary focuses on the dismissal of an appeal challenging ...

Licensor's Insolvency Plea Dismissed: Inflated Claims, Revised Fees Ignored.

Case Laws IBC

October 9, 2024

The summary focuses on the dismissal of an appeal challenging the rejection of an insolvency application u/s 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The key points are: 1) The appellant claimed interest on license fees, which was disallowed as interest was not agreed upon in the agreement. 2) A portion of the claimed default fell within the prohibited period u/s 10A of the IBC, which the corporate debtor was entitled to exclude. 3) The appellant argued continuous default before, during, and after the prohibited period, but the tribunal found it to be an artificial creation by inflating claims and omitting revised license fees. 4) After recalculating the actual unpaid amount by excluding the portion protected u/s 10A and improperly calculated interest, the outstanding default was below the Rs 1 crore threshold required u/s 4 of the IBC. 5) The appellate tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority's correct interpretation and application of Section 10A, concluding that the outstanding default did not meet the threshold, and dismissed the appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The summary focuses on the dismissal of an appeal challenging ...

Licensor's Insolvency Plea Dismissed: Inflated Claims, Revised Fees Ignored.

Case Laws IBC

October 9, 2024

You may also like:

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Income from pension fund u/s 10(23AAB) - CIT(A) admitted the fresh claim - Claim of exemption when the income is taxable u/s 44 - If the assessee failed to revise its...

The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

The High Court dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner seeking removal of his removal as Liquidator due to incomplete qualifications. The petitioner's application...

Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) - Settlement proposal initially rejected by Committee of Creditors (CoC), revised proposal submitted and pending...

Claim of expenditure in the revised return - Once, the assessee has realized that the claim was wrongly not made, the assessee has every right to revise the return...

Fixing the fee of IRP - fee of an RP falls under the definition of a ‘Claim’ as defined under the Code or not - The word ‘expenses’ includes the fee to be paid to the...

CIRP - Liability to pay transfer fee of 10% of the prevailing market value of the Kharagpur land - The court determines the validity of notices issued by the respondents...

The 2003 Policy of the Punjab Government granted exemption from payment of Market fee under Clause (i) of 11.4.2, but did not specifically exempt Rural Development fee....

Claim of appellant rejected on the ground that Resolution Plan has been approved by the CoC - right to claim consideration of claim again in third round - NOIDA’s status...

Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1)...

Exemption u/s 11 - Admittedly, the claim of exemption was made in the revised return filed within the statutory time limit but was treated as defective only on flimsy...

Businesses can revise GST transition claim form now

The assessee delayed filing the TDS statement, leading to late fees u/s 234E. The Assessing Officer issued an order u/s 200A regarding the late filing. The assessee...

The Adjudicating Authority rightly dismissed the Company Petition filed u/s 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) on the ground of pre-existing disputes between...

Quick Updates: