The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions made by the ...

Business profits fairly accepted; unexplained cash deposits allowed based on non-jurisdictional court rulings.

Case Laws Income Tax

October 16, 2024

The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer. Regarding the addition of gross profit (GP) shown by increasing the GP rate, the ITAT found the CIT(A)'s findings logical and justified, as the GP rate was lower than the previous year's rate. On the addition u/s 69A for cash deposited in the bank account, the ITAT accepted the CIT(A)'s reliance on non-jurisdictional High Court decisions in the absence of a jurisdictional High Court order. The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A) that without evidence of bogus sales, sales from accepted purchases and stock cannot be rejected. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal on both grounds.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions made by the ...

Business profits fairly accepted; unexplained cash deposits allowed based on non-jurisdictional court rulings.

Case Laws Income Tax

October 16, 2024

You may also like:

Addition u/s 69A - AIR information revealed cash deposits in assessee's savings bank account - assessee applied Section 44AD of the Act on business income. Held:...

Cash deposits in bank account as unexplained cash deposits - cash deposits pertained to assessee's retail business - Since the assessee has not maintained any books of...

Addition u/s 69A - cash deposits during demonetization period - business of hiring of cars - A reasonable amount of cash deposits during demonetization period is out of...

Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained cash credit - CIT(A) accepted the source of cash deposits without any supporting documents, the issue require detailed enquiry with regard...

Unexplained cash deposits - difference in turnover as unexplained investments - The reasons cited by AO that assessee had failed to file any evidence regarding his...

Deposits by the assessee in bank account during demonetization period were not unexplained. Section 69A is inapplicable as there were proper entries for cash sales, cash...

Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus...

The ITAT considered the issue of cash deposits and other credits in the assessee's saving bank account. The tribunal noted that the cash deposits were not made in a...

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

Unexplained cash deposits in bank - receipt of rental deposits in cash - The fact remains that the cash rental deposits have been received by the assessee which is not...

The assessee offered presumptive tax u/s 44AD on contract receipts, declaring net profit at 15% except for one year. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions for...

The assessee made cash deposits during the demonetization period which were treated as unexplained u/s 69A. However, the Tribunal held that the cash deposits were within...

Cash credit u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposit during demonetization period - assessee's failure to maintain books of accounts u/s 44AD. Held that where exemption from...

Unexplained investment u/s 69 - cash deposit - the alleged transactions of cash deposits and corresponding entries of cheque issued were not in the nature of any...

The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed an addition u/s 69A for unexplained cash deposits in the bank account. The assessee failed to explain the sources for cash deposits,...

Quick Updates: