Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2024 Year 2024 This

Tax assessment proceedings involving GSTR 3B returns mismatch ...


GSTR 3B mismatch with auto-populated GSTR 2A; tax demand partially recovered from bank; order set aside for reconsideration after reply.

Case Laws     GST

October 26, 2024

Tax assessment proceedings involving GSTR 3B returns mismatch with auto-populated GSTR 2A. Disputed tax demand partially recovered through bank appropriation exceeding 10%. Order confirming demand solely for non-reply to show cause notice set aside for reconsideration after petitioner's reply. Matter remanded to allow petitioner to file reply within 15 days, raising all contentions.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Demand of GST - Discrepancy between the GSTR-3B returns and the auto populated GSTR-2A returns - The court observed that the tax demand solely pertained to the disparity...

  2. The High Court set aside the impugned tax demand order due to violation of principles of natural justice, as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to...

  3. The court set aside the impugned order pertaining to tax demand arising from mismatch between GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated GSTR 2A, subject to petitioner remitting...

  4. Principles of natural justice violated as petitioner was not provided reasonable opportunity to contest tax demand due to unawareness of proceedings entrusted to...

  5. Validity of assessment order - mismatch between the GSTR 3B returns filed by the petitioner and the auto-populated GSTR 2A returns - The High court acknowledged the...

  6. The court held that the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the department due to discrepancy between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A violated principles of natural...

  7. Petitioner challenged order u/s 74 of TNGST Act, 2017 for assessment year 2017-18 due to mismatch between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A regarding input tax credit....

  8. Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as petitioner's contentions were not considered - mismatch between petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated...

  9. In a High Court case, the petitioner challenged an order due to inability to respond to show cause notice or participate in proceedings because of cancer diagnosis....

  10. Validity of assessment order - Disparity in Returns - The High Court examined the case thoroughly. It noted that the entire tax liability stemmed from the disparity...

  11. Advance Ruling application on maintainability - Reversal of input tax credit to extent of tax element in credit note - no agreement between parties on credit notes not...

  12. Petitioner failed to substantiate Input Tax Credit claim due to lack of supplier certificates. Discrepancy noted between Input Tax Credit availed in GSTR 3B and...

  13. Breach of principles of natural justice occurred due to lack of proper service of show cause notice (SCN). The impugned order and preceding notices were uploaded on the...

  14. The High Court granted relief to the petitioner by directing the release of attachment over immovable properties due to discrepancies between GSTR 3B returns and...

  15. Discrepancies between input tax credit availed by petitioner in GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A. Court granted partial relief by setting aside impugned order...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates