The appellant was liable to pay service tax on banking and ...

Bank served with tax demand but no penalty due to unintentional non-disclosure.

Case Laws Service Tax

October 29, 2024

The appellant was liable to pay service tax on banking and financial services, but their failure to do so was not willful or deliberate. The non-disclosure of certain assessable items does not attract the extended period of limitation under the proviso to Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994. No penalty is imposable on the appellant, but they must pay interest on the belated payment of tax u/s 75 of the Finance Act, 1994. The High Court partially allowed the appeal, holding that no penalty is payable by the appellant under any provisions of the Act, but they must pay interest on the belated tax payment.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The appellant was liable to pay service tax on banking and ...

Bank served with tax demand but no penalty due to unintentional non-disclosure.

Case Laws Service Tax

October 29, 2024

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 43 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income & Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act 2015 (BMA) - Even before the bank account was detected by the revenue...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

The ITAT Delhi held that interest levied u/s 220(2) on non-payment of FBT demand, adjusted against a refund due, was not justified as no intimation or notice of demand...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Levy of service tax on ATM interchange fees received by State Bank of Hyderabad from SBI for deploying its ATMs in the shared network, and on notional consideration for...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Show cause notice served on petitioner by uploading in GST portal tab without other communication mode; petitioner unaware of proceedings; tax demand confirmed due to...

Breach of principles of natural justice occurred as the petitioner was unaware of proceedings due to non-communication by the consultant entrusted with GST compliances,...

Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) categorization - Amendment made in sec 43B and 43D to substitute the words, “a deposit taking non-banking financial company or...

Levy of Service Tax - leasing of the land of Kandla Port Trust - The show cause notice was issued only for demand of interest and penalty and there is no demand of...

Loss reduced due to adj. u/s 143(1) – demand of tax is sustainable

Proceedings initiated u/s 144C - legality of the order by framing the so-called draft assessment order - while framing the said draft assessment order, the AO not only...

Non-payment of service tax on management consultancy services, royalty services, intellectual property right services, business auxiliary services, and banking and...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non appearance before the Assessing Officer - AO kept an issuing notices on the wrong address even when the first notice was not served...

Quick Updates: