Petitioner challenged impugned orders, recovery notices and bank ...

Mismatch between GSTR-3B & 2A; Court accepts error, sets aside assessments for 2017-18 to 2020-21 for reconsideration on 10% payment.

Case Laws GST

October 30, 2024

Petitioner challenged impugned orders, recovery notices and bank attachment notice due to mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. Court accepted petitioner's contention of error in filing GSTR-3B, supported by certificate. Considering respondent's submission, Court set aside four assessment orders for 2017-18 to 2020-21, remanding matters to State Tax Officer for fresh consideration. Condition imposed on petitioner to pay 10% of disputed tax amount within four weeks for setting aside orders to take effect. Petition disposed of by way of remand.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Petitioner challenged impugned orders, recovery notices and bank ...

Mismatch between GSTR-3B & 2A; Court accepts error, sets aside assessments for 2017-18 to 2020-21 for reconsideration on 10% payment.

Case Laws GST

October 30, 2024

You may also like:

One-day delay in filing GSTR-3B for September 2020 led to reversal of ITC. Petitioner filed GSTR-3B on 23.10.2020, one day late. Respondent issued Form GST DRC-01A on 22....

Petitioner challenged order u/s 74 of TNGST Act, 2017 for assessment year 2017-18 due to mismatch between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A regarding input tax credit....

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was challenged due to lack of material relating to alleged wrongful IGST refunds for assessment year 2020-21. Disallowable expenditure...

Petition challenging adjudication order u/s 73(9) of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 for reversing ITC availed in GSTR-3B filed after prescribed time limit u/s 16(4). Court noted...

The court held that the petitioner was denied the principles of natural justice by not being given a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits regarding...

Petitioners challenged adjudication order passed u/s 73(9) of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017. Court noted Rs. 3,96,08,142/- was reversible as petitioners availed ITC by filing...

The High Court addressed the challenge to notifications extending the time limit for issuance of orders u/s 73 of the CGST/AGST Act, 2017, due to the "force majeure"...

Return in FORM GSTR-3B of CGST Rules, 2017 along with due dates of furnishing the said form for April, 2020 to September, 2020 - Notification as amended

Vires of Rule 117(1A) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - time limitation - permission to petitioner to electronically upload form TRAN-I or avail input tax...

Challenge to assessment order and rectification order for assessment year 2018-19 - mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A/GSTR-2B - order challenged on grounds of...

Services supplied before 18.07.2022, invoices proposed for price escalation. Rate of GST 18% applicable as per Section 14(a)(i) of CGST Act, 2017 on invoices issued...

Permission to rectify the GST Return filed for the period September, 2017 and March 2018 in Form-B2B instead of B2C as was wrongly filed under GSTR-1 in order to get the...

Interest liability - delay in furnishing GSTR-3B return - Liability imposed without any adjudication proceeding u/s 73 or 74 - despite disputing the liability towards...

The High Court addressed the extension of due dates u/s 73 of the CGST/AGST Act, 2017 due to the Covid-19 pandemic. It examined the provisions related to the time limit...

Validity of assessment order - mismatch between the GSTR 3B returns filed by the petitioner and the auto-populated GSTR 2A returns - The High court acknowledged the...

Quick Updates: