Service tax demand on unbilled amount not chargeable. Section 67 ...

Unbilled amounts not taxable for services, rules Supreme Court.

Case Laws Service Tax

November 9, 2024

Service tax demand on unbilled amount not chargeable. Section 67 clearly states that only the gross amount charged from the service recipient shall be considered as the gross value for service tax. The unbilled amount, not charged by the appellant to the service recipient, is not part of the gross value u/s 67. Hence, the unbilled amount is not liable to service tax. This issue has been settled by the Supreme Court in Intercontinental Consultants Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. and the Gujarat High Court in Linde Engineering India Pvt. Ltd., holding that unbilled amounts cannot be subject to service tax. Assessee's appeal allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Service tax demand on unbilled amount not chargeable. Section 67 ...

Unbilled amounts not taxable for services, rules Supreme Court.

Case Laws Service Tax

November 9, 2024

You may also like:

Determination of the taxable value for payment of service tax on reverse charge basis by the service recipient in respect of Goods Transport Agency (GTA) Services. The...

Valuation - Cable Operator’s Services - Appellant cannot exclude the amounts received for maintenance charges from taxable value in view the Sub-Rule 1 of Rule 5 of...

The appellants, service providers of Mall Maintenance and Repair (MMR) services, were subjected to service tax demand on the reimbursements received towards expenses...

Levy of service tax on reimbursement amounts based on Rule 5(1) of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006, and whether the reimbursement amount can be...

Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67...

The High Court held that the value of free diesel supplied by the service recipient to the Goods Transport Agency (GTA) service provider cannot be included in the...

Liquidated damages arising from breach of contract or forfeiture of amounts like salary or bond money do not constitute consideration for a declared service u/s 66E(e)....

Whether the compensation received by the appellant for cancellation of agreements to purchase land constitutes a taxable service u/s 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994. The...

The case involved determining whether services provided to overseas clients constituted export of services u/s Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal held that services falling...

Disllowance of CENVAT Credit - Rule 6(5) of CCR provides that the provisions of Rule 6(1), (2) and (3) are not applicable, where input service received is used both for...

Refund of unutilised CENVAT Credit - intermediary services or not - POPOS Rules - export of services - The learned CESTAT has rightly concluded that all services except...

Refund of service tax paid - Scope of Rule 5B of CCR - Since the respondent discharged the service tax liability in the capacity of recipient of service, Rule 5B should...

The service tax liability on the amount paid as reimbursable to the professionals will not includable as gross value of services and not taxable under Rule 5(1) and also...

Export of services or not - Reversal of Credit - The fundamental charge that the service recipients are ‘other establishments’ of service providers in terms of in terms...

Classification of service - Pure agent or service provider - The applicant does not satisfy any one of the conditions mentioned in the Rule 33 of CGST Rules, 2017 which...

Quick Updates: