Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Indian Laws - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

Respondents made a concession before the Regulatory Authority to ...


Builders wrongly claimed before Appellate Tribunal they hadn't conceded interest liability before Regulator.

Case Laws     Indian Laws

November 18, 2024

Respondents made a concession before the Regulatory Authority to accept interest only on amounts paid after RERA implementation. However, before the Appellate Authority, they insisted no such concession was made. Instead of filing an application with the Regulatory Authority to correct the erroneous recording of the concession, Respondents filed an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal. The Appellate Tribunal entertained the appeal without any pleading from Respondents regarding the erroneous recording of the concession. It erroneously concluded that no concession was made based on absence of certain points in the Regulatory Authority's order. The High Court held that the Appellate Tribunal committed a jurisdictional error by entertaining the appeal without Respondents first seeking clarification from the Regulatory Authority regarding the concession. It also erred by entertaining an oral plea about non-concession without any pleading in the appeal memo. The Appellate Tribunal's order was set aside as indefensible.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Interest liability - seeking waiver of interest since the payment of service tax was paid under the amnesty scheme - The tribunal observed that the appellant's payment...

  2. The petitioner contested the levy of interest, claiming tax liability was paid from the credit ledger, precluding interest charges. However, the court observed factual...

  3. The case involves the computation of interest under section 234B for defaults in payment of advance tax. The Appellate Tribunal held that interest was correctly charged...

  4. Sections 132B, 140A, 153A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were analyzed regarding adjustment of seized cash against tax liability. The appellants claimed that cash...

  5. Income from other sources - Deduction of interest expenditure - direction of the CIT – A in restricting the deduction to the extent of income earned of term deposit -...

  6. The NCLAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of maintainability of a section 9 application due to non-fulfillment of the prescribed threshold of Rs.1 crore and...

  7. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of refund and adjustment of security amount in a claim. It examined Clause 8 of the Claim Form and found that the security...

  8. Liability of interest - allegation of undue or excess claim of ITC - By virtue of the Amendment in 2022 that has retrospective effect from 2017, it is only when ITC has...

  9. The Appellate Tribunal held that denial of interest on delayed refund of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) was incorrect. Lower authorities misinterpreted section 244A(1)...

  10. The case involved a claim for refund of interest u/s 72 of Finance Act, 2010 to benefit from a retrospective amendment to Rule 6 of CCR, 2002/2004. The Tribunal held...

  11. The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer u/s 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The provisions...

  12. The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Petitioners seeking initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate...

  13. Requirement of pre-deposit towards compliance with proviso to Section 43 (5) of RERA - liability of Appellant to pay interest is not in praesenti but in future -...

  14. Deduction of Interest liability - merely because assessee has disputed its liability it can can not be held as un-ascertained liability - interest liability of earlier...

  15. The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of levying interest u/s 234B in proceedings u/s 147/148. The AO had enhanced the interest from the date of the original...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates