Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT / Sales Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

Claim of second sale exemption and the imposition of penalty u/s ...


Dealer's burden to prove initial sale for second sale exemption; wilful suppression invites penalty.

Case Laws     VAT / Sales Tax

November 22, 2024

Claim of second sale exemption and the imposition of penalty u/s 12(5)(iii). The High Court held that when the burden was on the dealer to prove the factum of second sale, the respondent had failed to discharge this burden by proving the actual first sale, which was a prerequisite for claiming the exemption. The Tribunal had erroneously shifted the burden from the dealer to the revenue. Relying on previous decisions, the High Court reiterated that the burden of proving an earlier taxable sale was on the assessee. Regarding the penalty u/s 12(5)(iii), the Court held that since the respondent had wilfully suppressed taxable turnover and failed to file returns, the Assessing Officer was justified in imposing the penalty, and the Tribunal's decision to delete the penalty was untenable. Consequently, the High Court set aside the Tribunal's order and restored the assessment order confirmed by the appellate authority.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refund of Excess ITR certified by the Auditor - Input Tax Rebate (ITR) - u/s 15, the burden of proving that any sale or purchase effected by a dealer is not liable to...

  2. Disallowance of branch transfer - Interstate sale - CST - Mere location of the dealer in Bangalore, Karnataka and appellants at Bangalore, ipso facto, would not justify...

  3. The High Court confirmed the tax assessment u/s 7A for nonproduction of sale bill. The burden of proof lies on the dealer to show transactions are not taxable. Failure...

  4. Addition u/s 68 - unsecured cash credit - initial burden to prove identity, genuineness of the transactions and creditworthiness of the creditor - the identity of the...

  5. The burden of proving that the movement of goods was occasioned not by reason of sale is on the dealer and to discharge this burden he must furnish to the assessing...

  6. Input Tax Credit (ITC) - Genuineness - Onus to prove - Mere production of the invoices or the payment made by cheques is not enough and cannot be said to be discharging...

  7. CENVAT Credit - second stage dealer or third stage dealer - goods procured through consignment agent (against F form under CST) of the second stage dealer cannot be...

  8. Mere non-payment of duties is not collusion or willful misstatement or suppression of facts - Article

  9. The key points are: Appropriation of Rs. 11,00,000 deposited under protest during investigation cannot be considered as acceptance of liability. The extended period of...

  10. Claim of sales tax exemption on rice bran - It is not for the selling dealer to go after the purchasing dealer to find out as to in what manner he utilized the goods,...

  11. Entitlement to Input Tax Credit - suppression of turnover or not - Bogus dealer - genuine purchase or not - There cannot be any dispute as to the burden cast on the...

  12. Input Tax Credit (denied retrospectively) - denial on account of cancellation of the VAT registration of the dealers (who have effected sale of the goods to these...

  13. Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

  14. Confiscation - Smuggling of Betel Nuts - discharge of burden to prove u/s 123 of Customs Act - The betel nut is not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962...

  15. Suppression of tax - alleged unaccounted sales - scope of the word 'an estimate' - one need not dwell into all details furnished by the Intelligence Officer in...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates