Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is not leviable on additional income ...


Additional income offer doesn't attract penalty; Mere cash deposit isn't income; Appeal filing failure /= admission.

Case Laws     Income Tax

November 29, 2024

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is not leviable on additional income offered by the assessee in response to a notice issued u/s 148, as held in Kirit Dahyabhai Patel and Ravi Sud cases. Regarding the addition u/s 69 on account of a bank deposit, mere cash deposit cannot be considered the assessee's income. Failure to file an appeal does not imply admission by the assessee. Each addition cannot be the basis for levying a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) unless the Assessing Officer finds that the assessee deliberately furnished inaccurate particulars or concealed income. The assessee contended that the bank account credited with the deposit was shown in the cash book, and the deposit was not unexplained. Considering these facts, no justification exists for levying a penalty, even on the addition. The assessee's appeal is allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - unexplained cash deposit - the assessee has requested the Assessing Officer to treat the incurred cash deposit as his total sales receipts of...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on additional income voluntarily offered in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). However, no reference was made to corroborative...

  3. Cash credit u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposit during demonetization period - assessee's failure to maintain books of accounts u/s 44AD. Held that where exemption from...

  4. Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

  5. Deposits by the assessee in bank account during demonetization period were not unexplained. Section 69A is inapplicable as there were proper entries for cash sales, cash...

  6. Cash deposits made during demonetization period from cash withdrawals and rental income received in cash were substantiated through cash flow statements and bank...

  7. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  8. Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus...

  9. Cash deposits made post demonetization represented unaccounted income of the assessee qua AY 2017-2018 - Having regard to the extensive material which has been examined...

  10. Penalty u/s 271AAB for unexplained cash commission expenses u/s 69C cannot be imposed if the additional income disclosed by the assessee in the return of income is not...

  11. During the demonetization period, the assessee deposited Rs. 36.50 lacs in Specified Bank Notes (SBNs) in their bank account. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition...

  12. The assessee, a septuagenarian gynecologist with no business income during the year, made cash deposits totaling Rs. 10 lakh in her bank account during demonetization....

  13. Unexplained cash deposits in bank - receipt of rental deposits in cash - The fact remains that the cash rental deposits have been received by the assessee which is not...

  14. Unexplained investment u/s 69 - cash deposit - the alleged transactions of cash deposits and corresponding entries of cheque issued were not in the nature of any...

  15. Gynecologist with income from profession and investments deposited demonetized currency notes in bank account. Onus on assessee to prove source. HELD: During...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates