The Appellate Tribunal upheld the validity of reopening ...

Tribunal upholds reopening assessment based on AIR cash deposits, partially allows unexplained money/investments.

December 3, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the validity of reopening assessment proceedings u/s 147 and issuing notice u/s 148 based on information from the Annual Information Return (AIR) about substantial cash deposits in the assessee's bank accounts. The Tribunal ruled that the Assessing Officer (AO) had sufficient tangible material to reopen the case and the assessee's contention regarding non-supply of AIR information details was rejected. Regarding the additions made u/ss 69A and 69 for unexplained money and investments, the Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's grounds. Considering the decision in CIT vs. Samir Synthetics Mill, the Tribunal estimated 10% of the cash credits of Rs. 43,99,215 and other credits of Rs. 1.70 lacs as the assessee's reasonable income to avoid revenue leakage, instead of treating the entire transactions as income.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the validity of reopening ...

Tribunal upholds reopening assessment based on AIR cash deposits, partially allows unexplained money/investments.

December 3, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition u/s 69A - Addition of cash deposits made by the assessee during the demonetization period - The Tribunal examined the legality of the assessment order, the...

The assessee offered presumptive tax u/s 44AD on contract receipts, declaring net profit at 15% except for one year. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions for...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 - reasons to believe - The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reopening, considering the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer...

Cash deposits in bank account unexplained - assessee failed to substantiate source for deficit amount - reasons recorded for reopening assessment valid - addition partly...

Validity of reopening the assessment u/s 147 - Additions u/s 68 and u/s 69A - Cash deposits in assessee’s bank account - The ITAT observed that, the AO was satisfied...

The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed an addition u/s 69A for unexplained cash deposits in the bank account. The assessee failed to explain the sources for cash deposits,...

The appellant could not establish the source for cash deposits during demonetization. The Appellate Tribunal held that sales cannot be rejected solely based on higher...

The assessee's unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were deleted by the CIT(A) after accepting the submissions that the cash receipts from various sources like cash sales,...

The ITAT considered the issue of cash deposits and other credits in the assessee's saving bank account. The tribunal noted that the cash deposits were not made in a...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond four years. The assessment was based on notes to accounts for AY 2009-10....

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was based on reasons to believe the difference between total cash sales and cash sales reflected in books. Held: Reopening was made only...

The case pertains to the reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 of the Income Tax Act due to undisclosed cash deposits in the assessee's bank accounts. The key points are:...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - As reopening of the assessment has been made on the basis of AIR information which is not based on correct facts and the AO has not...

The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) could not reopen the assessment merely based on a belief that the average gross profit in the assessee's business...

Cash credit u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposit during demonetization period - assessee's failure to maintain books of accounts u/s 44AD. Held that where exemption from...

Quick Updates: